Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Template talk:Song-stub

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image_swap-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z-Image_swap"],"text":"Image swap","linkableTitle":"Image swap"}-->

Image swap

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image_swap-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z-Image_swap"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image_swap-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z-Image_swap"],"text":"Image swap","linkableTitle":"Image swap"}-->

I've been replacing this png with Image:Musical notes.svg on all the other music-related templates, but this one is protected... requesting assistance! ~ Booya Bazooka 03:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","author":"Booyabazooka","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z-Image_swap","replies":["c-R._Koot-2006-08-01T13:25:00.000Z-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Booya Bazooka"}}-->

Done. —Ruud 13:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-01T13:25:00.000Z","author":"R. Koot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-R._Koot-2006-08-01T13:25:00.000Z-Booyabazooka-2006-08-01T03:21:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Ruud"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unlinking_song-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z-Unlinking_song"],"text":"Unlinking song","linkableTitle":"Unlinking song"}-->

Unlinking song

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unlinking_song-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z-Unlinking_song"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Unlinking_song-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z-Unlinking_song"],"text":"Unlinking song","linkableTitle":"Unlinking song"}-->

{{editprotected}} "Song" is a common, widely-understood word, there's no beneft to linking it. Can the linking be removed, per WP:OVERLINK? Colonies Chris (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","author":"Colonies Chris","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z-Unlinking_song","replies":["c-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z"]}}-->

Your mass delinking has caused controversy in the past. Is there a consensus for delinking words in stub templates? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z","author":"MSGJ","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-26T12:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-30T00:44:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z","c-MSGJ-2011-01-31T12:28:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z"]}}-->
  1. My suggestion is in line with the MoS - see WP:OVERLINK
  2. I proposed this type of unlinking at WT:STUB#Valueless links in stub templates months ago and it received no objections
  3. Another user subsequently raised the isssue at WP:WSS#Delinking_of_templates and the only 'controversy' was a complaint about a simple error I had made in one isolated case.
  4. Back in October last year I delinked the word 'song' from more than a dozen stub templates (children of this one); there have been no objections and no reversions of these changes. Colonies Chris (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-30T00:44:00.000Z","author":"Colonies Chris","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Colonies_Chris-2011-01-30T00:44:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
It may be that no one is objecting, but whenever this has been discussed there have been editors who have expressed opposition to what you are doing. I've posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Stub_sorting#Delinking_of_templates to try to determine whether these edits are considered worthwhile. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-31T12:28:00.000Z","author":"MSGJ","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-MSGJ-2011-01-31T12:28:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-29T22:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-MSGJ-2011-02-02T15:24:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-31T12:28:00.000Z"]}}-->
No opposition, so  Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T15:24:00.000Z","author":"MSGJ","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-MSGJ-2011-02-02T15:24:00.000Z-MSGJ-2011-01-31T12:28:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya