This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
The SpaceX Falcons are not technically ELVs, seeing as they are re-usable, and the whole meaning of the term "ELV" denotes that the rocket in question is not reusable.
Therefore, I suggest that the template is renamed to cover all rockets capable of launching satellites into orbit. This would also allow the Space Shuttle, and other re-usable launchers to be included. --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk|Contribs | Chess | E-mail19:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-16T19:02:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2006-08-16T19:02:00.000Z-Rename?","replies":[],"displayName":"|User Page"}}-->
(OPPOSE)--aceslead03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z","author":"Aces lead","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aces_lead-2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z-Rename?","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-10-20T21:39:00.000Z-Aces_lead-2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z"],"displayName":"aceslead"}}-->
For the record, I dropped this proposal and now support the current system, per discussion below. I have reverted edits by Dojarca (talk·contribs) to the effect of implementing this proposal, per the opposition of this proposal. Please start new discussion if you want to contest the current arrangement. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk21:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-20T21:39:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-10-20T21:39:00.000Z-Aces_lead-2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was No consensus, default Not moved. —Centrx→talk • 02:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-27T02:45:00.000Z","author":"Centrx","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Centrx-2006-08-27T02:45:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":[]}}-->
Template:ELVs → Template:LVs – Prevent disputes about Semi-ELVs, make template cover all Satellite Launch Vehicle articles, not just expendable ones. This would allow it to cover the Space Shuttle, and the SpaceX Falcons (the latter are already, incorrectly, included) to name a few. GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk|Contribs | Chess | E-mail21:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-16T21:51:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2006-08-16T21:51:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":[],"displayName":"|User Page"}}-->
(OPPOSE)--aceslead03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z","author":"Aces lead","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aces_lead-2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z-Requested_move","replies":[],"displayName":"aceslead"}}-->
Discussion
I already removed partially reusable launch vehicles from the template. I think that a template for Reusable launch vehicles and Partially reusable launch vehicles should be created.--aceslead03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z","author":"Aces lead","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aces_lead-2006-08-17T03:13:00.000Z-Discussion","replies":[],"displayName":"aceslead"}}-->
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GW_Simulations-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Ares_and_Falcon-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon","c-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon"],"text":"Ares and Falcon","linkableTitle":"Ares and Falcon"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GW_Simulations-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Ares_and_Falcon-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon","c-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon"],"text":"Ares and Falcon","linkableTitle":"Ares and Falcon"}-->
Please stop adding Ares to the "in development" section. It is partially reusable, and therefore not an ELV. Falcon does not qualify either --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk19:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2006-10-10T19:15:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
According to the latest changes made by NASA, the Ares I would become a true ELV due to the deletion of the SRB recovery system, thus the SRB-based first stage will end its life on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean like all other American ELVs. Ares V, on the other hand, will still be partially reusable. Rwboa2223:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z","author":"Rwboa22","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z-Ares_and_Falcon","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
Do you have a cite?
Is it official or just a rumour?
A lot of rumours have been going around about Constellation. If they were all true, we'd be seeing a spacecraft called Alitair being launched from LC-34 (or was that LC-37A, LC-40, or LC-39C) at Canaveral. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk21:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:32:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
The page for Shavit says that Israel plans to use Indian rockets in the future. Does this put their own launcher in the past? Potatoswatter15:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-02-09T15:18:00.000Z","author":"Potatoswatter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Potatoswatter-2007-02-09T15:18:00.000Z-Shavit?","replies":[]}}-->
Answer: No it did not, Shavit 2 launched as recently as 2020. It is quite risky in spaceflight business to do concousions based on "proposals" or even "announced intentions" etc. Best wait until you see flames coming from the bottom of the rocket before it is conclusion time.El Roih (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-26T20:44:00.000Z","author":"El Roih","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-El_Roih-2022-02-26T20:44:00.000Z-Shavit?","replies":[]}}-->
I think a semi-reusable rocket template should be created and that the Shuttle, Ares V, SpaceX Falcons, and the Energia rocket would be given their proper placement in Wikipedia. If anyone asks "Why Energia?", the response will be that the four liquid-fueled boosters (which became the Zenit ELV rocket) were reusable and that a fully-reusable Energia was in the works before the collapse of the USSR. Rwboa2223:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-12T23:36:00.000Z","author":"Rwboa22","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:36:00.000Z-Semi-Reusable_Rocket_Template","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-10-20T22:20:00.000Z-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:36:00.000Z"]}}-->
Done - see Template:RLVs(edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk22:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-20T22:20:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-10-20T22:20:00.000Z-Rwboa22-2007-03-12T23:36:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_do_not_include:-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:","c-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:"],"text":"Please do not include:","linkableTitle":"Please do not include:"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_do_not_include:-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:","c-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:"],"text":"Please do not include:","linkableTitle":"Please do not include:"}-->
Jupiter-C - A sounding rocket. Some were converted into ELVs, but these were called Juno I.
Redstone - A sub-orbital missile. One or two were used as ELVs, but under a different name, namely Sparta. The Project Mercury versions don't count as they were also sub-orbital.
This list is incomplete, based on things that have been added in the past. Please add to it, but sign your changes. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk21:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-03-27T21:23:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
Pegasus is not an ELV: L-1011 is re-usable.--80.223.18.18020:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z","author":"80.223.18.180","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z-Please_do_not_include:","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2007-04-25T21:01:00.000Z-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z","c-GW_Simulations-2008-06-28T08:57:00.000Z-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
That is like saying no rocket is an ELV because the launch pads are re-usable. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk21:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-25T21:01:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-04-25T21:01:00.000Z-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
Titan I was a missile, and was never used for orbital launches, so should not be included. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk08:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-28T08:57:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2008-06-28T08:57:00.000Z-80.223.18.180-2007-04-25T20:56:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
How about changing the title to "Expendable launch systems" to keep it in line with the main article? --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk09:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-21T09:08:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2007-10-21T09:08:00.000Z-Title_change","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
N.B. the category name is Category:Expendable launch vehicles. (sdsds - talk) 20:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z","author":"Sdsds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sdsds-2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z-Title_change","replies":["c-Sardanaphalus-2008-08-30T02:40:00.000Z-Sdsds-2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z","c-GW_Simulations-2008-09-01T17:43:00.000Z-Sdsds-2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
Rename this template or the category? Simiarly, Template:Reusable launch systems and Category:Reusable launch vehicles... Sardanaphalus (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-30T02:40:00.000Z","author":"Sardanaphalus","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sardanaphalus-2008-08-30T02:40:00.000Z-Sdsds-2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-GW_Simulations-2008-08-30T09:28:00.000Z-Sardanaphalus-2008-08-30T02:40:00.000Z"]}}-->
I would advise renaming the categories, as "expendable launch systems" is common to both American and British English, whereas "Expendable launch vehicles" is American English (albeit that it is sometimes used in the UK). The correct British English term is "carrier rocket". --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk09:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-30T09:28:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2008-08-30T09:28:00.000Z-Sardanaphalus-2008-08-30T02:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sardanaphalus-2008-09-01T15:06:00.000Z-GW_Simulations-2008-08-30T09:28:00.000Z"],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
While doing the above, I saw that the parent category for both categories is Space launch vehicles; should that also be redirected, to "Space launch systems"? Sardanaphalus (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-01T15:06:00.000Z","author":"Sardanaphalus","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sardanaphalus-2008-09-01T15:06:00.000Z-GW_Simulations-2008-08-30T09:28:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I would do them all except SDLVs. That is an industry term, and has no neutral alternative. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk17:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-01T17:43:00.000Z","author":"GW Simulations","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-GW_Simulations-2008-09-01T17:43:00.000Z-Sdsds-2008-08-29T20:48:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User Page"}}-->
A few years ago I proposed expanding the template's scope to encompass all orbital launch systems, not just expendable ones, however the discussion couldn't find a consensus either way. I'd like to propose it again now. In reality this seems to be a more useful categorisation since, as has been seen with Falcon, the line between reusable and expendable rockets is somewhat blurred. The only past or present orbital launch system which is not currently included in this template is the Space Shuttle - it is included in the reusable launch systems template, and could continue to be listed there as well, however that template's scope has significantly altered from being a version of this template for reusable and partially reusable launch systems. It would make sense to have one template for all vehicles capable of reaching orbit rather than exclude the Shuttle simply because it is partially reusable. --W.D.Graham07:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-14T07:20:00.000Z","author":"WDGraham","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-WDGraham-2013-09-14T07:20:00.000Z-Expanding_scope","replies":[],"displayName":"W."}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Splitting_the_template-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template","c-JFG-2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template"],"text":"Splitting the template","linkableTitle":"Splitting the template"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Splitting_the_template-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template","c-JFG-2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template"],"text":"Splitting the template","linkableTitle":"Splitting the template"}-->
Hello,
I think the template is starting to overgrow. It is becoming too large and cluttered to serve its purpose. Therefore I suggest the template be split into 3 or at least 2 parts. The 3 parts could be: Orbital launch systems (Current); Retired orbital launch system and Orbital launch systems in development. This would also neatly reflect the current structure of the template. I am not suggesting that anything be taken off the template, I am only suggesting the template be split into parts.
If the template would be split into 2 parts, those parts could be: Orbital launch systems, which would consist of current and retired orbital launch systems; and Orbital launch systems under development, which would consists of the "In development"-part of the current template.
Thank you,
El Roih (talk) 23:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","author":"El Roih","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template","replies":["c-Rowan_Forest-2019-10-29T23:27:00.000Z-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z"]}}-->
I have no preference, but I suggest you take a look at the {{Mexican Drug War}} template. They also overgrew the template content, and someone came up with this idea of collapsible sub-sections. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 23:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-10-29T23:27:00.000Z","author":"Rowan Forest","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rowan_Forest-2019-10-29T23:27:00.000Z-El_Roih-2019-10-29T23:00:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
As navboxes go, this one is not particularly crowded. A split would prevent readers from seeing links between current and historical vehicles (e.g. the Soyuz series). — JFGtalk07:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z","author":"JFG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JFG-2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z-Splitting_the_template","replies":["c-El_Roih-2019-10-31T02:50:00.000Z-JFG-2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z"]}}-->
Good point JFG. So maybe splitting into 3 would be unwise. But how about splitting into 2 (the current and retired launch systems and the systems under development)? That would retain the links between current and historical vehicles. Also, splitting into 2 would have the added benefit of increasing the quality of the template. What I mean by this is that taking the systems under developments into their own template, what would remain (the current+historic launch systems) would be solid fact. Being an "orbital launch system in development" does not actually mean a whole lot nowadays (if it ever has, the history of spaceflight is full of rocket designs that never made it anywhere near the launch pad), with some small orbital launcher development projects being basically a group of guys operating from a garage. So taking the "under development" ones out, we would eliminate a lot of uncertainty from the template, and as said above, what would remain would at least be the kind of solid fact you would expect to find from an encyclopedia like Wikipedia (I honestly think some of the "in development" rocket programs are more hearsay than any type of encyclopedic material). Thank you, El Roih (talk) 02:50, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-10-31T02:50:00.000Z","author":"El Roih","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-El_Roih-2019-10-31T02:50:00.000Z-JFG-2019-10-30T07:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-JFG-2019-12-01T23:10:00.000Z-El_Roih-2019-10-31T02:50:00.000Z"]}}-->
I agree that we should not give prominence to "paper rockets", and we should monitor developments of listed projects here. I just removed a few of them, that were either canceled or not moving forward. I'm convinced that once-a-year assessment of progress is a better approach than splitting the template. — JFGtalk23:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-12-01T23:10:00.000Z","author":"JFG","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-JFG-2019-12-01T23:10:00.000Z-El_Roih-2019-10-31T02:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I won't speculate on what is and isn't "notable," but the following companies/vehicles are notable enough to merit their own Wikipedia articles, so should they also merit inclusion in this template? Perigee Aerospace, TiSPACE, Skyrora, Skyroot Aerospace. Rwald (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-18T03:05:00.000Z","author":"Rwald","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rwald-2021-01-18T03:05:00.000Z-Additional_in-development_vehicles","replies":[]}}-->
You can read above from the discussion "Splitting the template" about this.El Roih (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-26T20:50:00.000Z","author":"El Roih","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-El_Roih-2022-02-26T20:50:00.000Z-Additional_in-development_vehicles","replies":[]}}-->
دوري الدرجة الأولى السعودي السلسلة دوري الدرجة الأولى السعودي الموسم 2016–17 البلد السعودية الفائز نادي الفيحاء صاعدون نادي الفيحاءنادي أحد هابطون نادي العدالةنادي الجيلنادي وج المباريات الملعوبة 240 الأهداف المسجلة 599 (2.5 لكل مباراة) هداف الدوري عبد الفتاح آدم(20 أهد
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada Desember 2022. Santa Maria Cristina dari Perawan tak Bernoda Brando, S.V.E.G.S.Lahir1 Mei 1856Napoli, Campania, Kerajaan Dua SisiliaMeninggal20 Januari 1906 (usia 49)Casoria, Provinsi Napoli, Kerajaan ItaliaMakamCasoria, Napoli, ItaliaDihormati diGereja Katolik Roma...
Accidente del Beechcraft King Air de PEC Táxi Aéreo El avión accidentado en agosto de 2021, tres meses antes del accidente.Fecha 5 de noviembre de 2021Causa Vuelo controlado contra el terreno en aproximación para aterrizar; bajo investigaciónLugar 4 km al sur del aeropuerto de Piedade de Caratinga, Minas Gerais, BrasilCoordenadas 19°46′06″S 42°06′28″O / -19.7683299, -42.1077327Origen Aeropuerto Internacional de Goiânia, Goiânia, Goiás, BrasilDestino Aeropuert...
Observatório Europeu da Droga e da Toxicodependência European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) Organização Chefia Alexis Goosdeel Localização Jurisdição territorial União Europeia Sede Lisboa, Portugal Histórico Criação 1993 (30 anos) Sítio na internet Observatório Europeu da Droga e da Toxicodependência (em inglês) O Observatório Europeu da Droga e da Toxicodependência (OEDT) é uma agência da União Europeia. Foi estabelecida em 1993 e tem ...
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Gurland, 1885 Jonah Hayyim Gurland (1843 – March 14, 1890) was a Russian and Hebrew writer born at Kleck, government of Minsk. At the age of 10, Gurland entered the rabbinical school of Wilna, from which he gra...
1940 popular song For the 1998 television episode, see Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered (Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Bewitched (Bothered and Bewildered)SongPublished1941 by Chappell & Co.Composer(s)Richard RodgersLyricist(s)Lorenz Hart Bewitched (Bothered and Bewildered)[1] is a show tune and popular song from the 1940 Rodgers and Hart musical Pal Joey. It is part of the Great American Songbook. The song was introduced by Vivienne Segal on December 25, 1940, in the Broadway produ...
This article is about a former theme park attraction. For the early Disney cartoon, see Mickey's Revue. The Mickey Mouse RevueMickey Mouse Revue at Tokyo DisneylandMagic KingdomAreaFantasylandStatusRemovedOpening dateOctober 1, 1971Closing dateSeptember 14, 1980Replaced by Magic Journeys (1987–93) Legend of the Lion King (1994–2002) Mickey's PhilharMagic (2003–present) Tokyo DisneylandAreaFantasylandStatusRemovedOpening dateApril 15, 1983Closing dateMay 25, 2009Replaced byMickey's Philh...
Stock exchange in Budapest, Hungary Budapest Stock ExchangeBudapesti ÉrtéktőzsdeTypeStock exchangeLocation55 Krisztina boulevard, Budapest, HungaryFoundedJanuary 18, 1864; 159 years ago (1864-01-18) (original incarnation)June 21, 1990; 33 years ago (1990-06-21) (reinstated)OwnerHungarian private investors and the central bankKey peopleRichárd Végh (CEO)CurrencyHungarian forintNo. of listings154 (November 2023)[1]Market capUS$ 35,...
O-class submarine of the United States For other ships with the same name, see USS Nautilus and ships named Nautilus. Nautilus in Bergen History United States NameUSS O-12 Ordered3 March 1916 BuilderLake Torpedo Boat Company, Bridgeport, Connecticut Laid down6 March 1916 Launched29 September 1917 Commissioned19 October 1918 Decommissioned17 June 1924 RenamedNautilus, 24 March 1931 Stricken29 May 1930 FateScuttled, 20 November 1931 General characteristics TypeO-class submarine Displacement 491...
Private liberal arts college in Claremont, California, United States This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (November 2018) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Pitzer College...
Public university in Bankura, West Bengal, India Bankura UniversityMottoउत्तिष्ठत जाग्रत (Sanskrit) uttiṣṭhata jāgrata (ISO)Motto in EnglishArise, awakeTypePublic State UniversityEstablished2014; 9 years ago (2014)AccreditationNAACAcademic affiliationUGCAIUBCIEndowment₹4.5825 crore (US$570,000) (2021–22 est.)[1]ChancellorGovernor of West BengalVice-ChancellorGoutam Buddha SuralAcademic staff60[2]Students1,180&#...
Cabo Carvoeiro Cabo Carvoeiro Nau dos Corvos, en el cabo Carvoeiro, con las Berlengas al fondo.Ubicación administrativaPaís PortugalDivisión OesteSubdivisión Municipio de PenicheUbicación geográficaContinente EuropaPenínsula Península ibéricaMar / océano Océano AtlánticoCoordenadas 39°21′33″N 9°24′33″O / 39.35918, -9.40906Mapa de localización Cabo Carvoeiro Localización en Portugal Localización del cabo (mapa de la península de Peniche)[edi...
Praça Dira, em Riade, onde pessoas são regularmente decapitadas e têm membros amputados.[1][2][3] A Arábia Saudita tem sido muito criticada por seu histórico de desrespeito aos direitos humanos. As questões que têm atraído fortes críticas incluem a posição extremamente desvantajosa das mulheres dentro da sociedade saudita, a discriminação religiosa e a falta de liberdade religiosa e política. Entre 1996 e 2000, a Arábia Saudita aderiu a quatro convenções da Organização das ...
Gunboat adapted for river operations This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (February 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The USS Panay, a United States Navy river gunboat which served on the Yangtze Patrol. A river gunboat is a type of gunboat adapted for river operations. River gunboats re...
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (يوليو 2022) Azaria Alon Azaria Alon in 2009 معلومات شخصية الميلاد 15 نوفمبر 1918(1918-11-15)شطة (بيسان)، إسرائيل الوفاة 19 يناير 2014(2014-01-19) (aged 95)إسرائيل مكان الدفن شطة، بيسان الإقامة شطة، ...
2020 Michigan Democratic primary 2020 Michigan Democratic presidential primary ← 2016 March 10, 2020 2024 → ← IDMS →147 delegates (125 pledged, 22 unpledged)to the Democratic National ConventionThe number of pledged delegates won is determined by the popular vote Candidate Joe Biden Bernie Sanders Home state Delaware Vermont Delegate count 73 52 Popular vote 840,360 576,926 Percentage 52.9% 36.3% Results by county Congressional...
British writer (1767–1839) This article is about the writer. For the spy, see Elizabeth Bentley. Elizabeth BentleyElizabeth Bentley, Genuine Poetical Compositions, on Various Subjects (Norwich, by subscription, 1791)Born1767Norwich, England, UKDied1839 (aged 71–72)Norwich, England, UKResting placeSt Stephen's, NorwichOccupationPoetNationalityBritishPeriod1791–1821SubjectPastoral, Abolitionism, Animal welfare Elizabeth Bentley (1767–1839) was an English poet, one of a small wa...
.jpg){kind=small}
