This template is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Is "No Nonsense" a well-known brand? Does it deserve its place in this template? Antique Rose03:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-01T03:15:00.000Z","author":"Antique Rose","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Antique_Rose-2007-05-01T03:15:00.000Z-No_Nonsense","replies":["c-Daniel_Case-2007-05-01T14:28:00.000Z-Antique_Rose-2007-05-01T03:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
It's as common as L'eggs on US drugstore and supermarket shelves. Daniel Case14:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-01T14:28:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2007-05-01T14:28:00.000Z-Antique_Rose-2007-05-01T03:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The image is way too big. It looks grossy out of place on, for example, the Tabi article, which is about traditional Japanese footwear. Exploding Boy16:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-29T16:45:00.000Z","author":"Exploding Boy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Exploding_Boy-2007-06-29T16:45:00.000Z-Image","replies":["c-SiobhanHansa-2007-08-14T09:36:00.000Z-Exploding_Boy-2007-06-29T16:45:00.000Z"]}}-->
I agree. It looks out of place on the sock article too. Could we get a smaller and more neutral image? It used to have this image - image:Pile_of_pantyhose.jpg - which while not perfect, doesn't have the same distraction quality of the current image. -- SiobhanHansa09:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-14T09:36:00.000Z","author":"SiobhanHansa","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-SiobhanHansa-2007-08-14T09:36:00.000Z-Exploding_Boy-2007-06-29T16:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-Daniel_Case-2007-08-14T13:43:00.000Z-SiobhanHansa-2007-08-14T09:36:00.000Z"]}}-->
I liked it so much more too ... I thought it conveyed the appearance of a pile of socks perfectly. Here's the discussion that led me to keep the current image, if you want to understand what I was thinking. But if there's a separate consensus emerging for another image, or the original image, let's do it. Daniel Case13:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-14T13:43:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2007-08-14T13:43:00.000Z-SiobhanHansa-2007-08-14T09:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
and/or some definitions:
Over-the-Calf (OTC) / Executive
Mid-calf / Crew (don't exceed largest part of the calf)
Quarter / Anklets (cover the ankle bone)
Ped (touch bottom of ankle) FYIY, I've never heard this term before
Liner (don't show above the shoe)
No Show (hide inside the shoe)
Also, you're missing Sandal socks (ninja socks) aka: the oldest known type of socks.
If you'd like, start an article on it. Daniel Case (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-29T13:58:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2013-06-29T13:58:00.000Z-Additional_items","replies":[]}}-->
Also, the socks article doesn't have this template :P
~ender 2013-06-28 10:47:AM MST
Yes it does. Look again. Daniel Case (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-29T13:58:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2013-06-29T13:58:00.000Z-Additional_items-1","replies":[]}}-->
Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!
