This template is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories
This template was considered for deletion on 2008 February 15. The result of the discussion was "keep".
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-(Difficult_to_read)-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z-(Difficult_to_read)"],"text":"(Difficult to read)","linkableTitle":"(Difficult to read)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-(Difficult_to_read)-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z-(Difficult_to_read)"],"text":"(Difficult to read)","linkableTitle":"(Difficult to read)"}-->
This template is pretty much impossible to read. Could it be replaced with a graphic or something?
Eleland15:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","author":"Eleland","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z-(Difficult_to_read)","replies":["c-David_Kernow-2007-01-23T16:39:00.000Z-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z"]}}-->
Have imported format tried in {{Portuguese overseas empire}}. Regards, David Kernow(talk)16:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-01-23T16:39:00.000Z","author":"David Kernow","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-David_Kernow-2007-01-23T16:39:00.000Z-Eleland-2007-01-17T15:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Links_in_template-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z-Links_in_template"],"text":"Links in template","linkableTitle":"Links in template"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Links_in_template-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z-Links_in_template"],"text":"Links in template","linkableTitle":"Links in template"}-->
I changed the link from "Commonwealth of Nations" to "Commonwealth Realms" because the latter is more precise. That is, if the second link is "Commonwealth of Nations", then "British overseas territories" is redundant, as the Overseas Territories are also members of the Commonwealth, albeit with a different status to the realms. "British Empire and Commonwealth of Nations" would also be accurate and would not involve an overlap, as the latter is the historical successor of the former. Grant | Talk06:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","author":"Grant65","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z-Links_in_template","replies":["c-72.27.77.144-2007-02-20T20:11:00.000Z-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Grant"}}-->
How is the latter more precise? If anything it is too precise in that it excludes members of the Commonwealth, which are not Realms. What's the point of having the flag of the Commonwealth and having links to territories that are still in the Commonwealth if the title only reflects the Realms? Also having only the Realms in the title also misses the important point that the Commonwealth of Nations (and not just the Commonwealth Realms) is the historical successor to the British Empire. The term Commonwealth of Nations is not redundant because of the term "British overseas territories". If the term "British overseas territories" is redundant then it is mainly because of the term "British empire" not "Commonwealth of Nations". Anyway, why the fuss over the title? It was fine before, so if it isn't broken why fix it? The title is only reflecting the gradual change from the British Empire into the Commonwealth of Nations and the remnant British overseas territories (which are remnants of the Empire) as seen from the perspective of the UK (and to a lesser extent the world). The template makes no attempt to show Australia's or New Zealand's overseas territories although they are just as much a legacy of the British empire as the current overseas territories. Nobody today uses the term British empire to refer to the overseas territories, but likewise neither does anyone use the term Commonwealth of Nations to refer to these same territories. The template would be better served by coming up with a way to show not just the Commonwealth Realms but other Commonwealth countries (for example underlining...hmmm...I think, I'll do just that). Look on the British and Commonwealth citizenship template. It uses the term British and Commonwealth to refer to the fact that before the Commonwealth all the laws concerning citizenship were just British, but it doesn't attempt to discriminate only in favour of the Realms.72.27.77.14420:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-02-20T20:11:00.000Z","author":"72.27.77.144","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-72.27.77.144-2007-02-20T20:11:00.000Z-Grant65-2007-02-20T06:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Recently David Kernow attempted an overhaul of the format. The categories and other languages sections did need an overhaul and perhaps a better format can be found for the template as a whole. However the format David used....(see below)...
.....while simple and easy to use it doesn't adequately distinguish the categories. It uses capital letters to show both current territories and Commonwealth Realms (which indirectly implies that the Commonwealth realms are also current territories, cf. with older format (to which I reverted excepting for the categories and other languages):
This format shows that there are:
dgfhdhdhhdhdg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.240.118 (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-29T18:13:00.000Z","author":"81.145.240.118","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-81.145.240.118-2007-10-29T18:13:00.000Z-Formatting","replies":[]}}-->
"Current territories" and...
"Former territories", with the former territories being further categorized/formatted into:
"Commonwealth members", which are then further subdivided/categorized into:
"Commonwealth members that are Commonwealth Realms"
with each format being distinct for a country's specific status and there being no re-use of any one format except insofar as all current Commonwealth members are also former territories and all Commonwealth Realms are also Commonwealth members and former territories (and thus their formats must necessarily branch from each other in that order).72.27.85.10818:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z","author":"72.27.85.108","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-72.27.85.108-2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z-Formatting","replies":["c-David_Kernow-2007-03-04T02:46:00.000Z-72.27.85.108-2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z","c-Gnevin-2008-01-02T16:38:00.000Z-72.27.85.108-2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z"]}}-->
Per the edit summary I've just left, I've substituted a leading asterisk in place of underlining former territories now Commonwealth Realms, as the underlining seemed to draw undue attention. Using the asterisk to identify Realms rather than Commonwealth of Nations members seemed to make more sense given your analysis above. Thanks for spotting the original ambiguity! David Kernow(talk)02:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-04T02:46:00.000Z","author":"David Kernow","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-David_Kernow-2007-03-04T02:46:00.000Z-72.27.85.108-2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Formatting is very difficult to understand. I'd suggest for current use C former use F etc Gnevin (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-02T16:38:00.000Z","author":"Gnevin","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Gnevin-2008-01-02T16:38:00.000Z-72.27.85.108-2007-03-03T18:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Commonwealth_of_Nations-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z-Commonwealth_of_Nations"],"text":"Commonwealth of Nations","linkableTitle":"Commonwealth of Nations"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Commonwealth_of_Nations-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z-Commonwealth_of_Nations"],"text":"Commonwealth of Nations","linkableTitle":"Commonwealth of Nations"}-->
Does this really have anything at all to do with the Commonwealth? Surely, if it did, the likes of Mozambique (never in the Empire) and Cameroon (only the Cameroons of which were in the Empire) would be linked, whilst the dominions would be considered to be included post-independence (e.g. Canada after 1931, Australia after 1939, etc) or at least up until the London Declaration changed the Commonwealth's name. The fact that they're not, and that inclusion ceases once territories left the Empire, proves that it's not about the Commonwealth. Fine, have italics to denote current Commonwealth members or asterisks to denote Commonwealth Realms, but the template is not fundamentally about the Commonwealth, so it shouldn't be included in the title. Bastin 13:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The inclusion doesn't cease once the territories left the empire. It's supposed to be understood that once a territory leaves the empire it enters the Commonwealth in its own right (hence the font formats). What would be the point of having two date sets? For instance Barbados would have to have a colonial date set and a commonwealth date set that would go something like:
1624-1966; from 1966 in the Commonwealth *Barbados
This is rather redundant, since by the very format, it is known that Barbados is in the Commonwealth and probably has been since 1966. Why repeat the information? As you point out though, Mozambique is not in the list and thats mainly because this list is about the Empire and the Commonwealth that evolved from it. As Mozambique was never a part of the empire it can't be fitted in with the normal format. But that shouldn't be a problem, since Mozambique is a special case anyway. All that is needed is a footnote in the Africa section (probably something like: N.B. Mozambique joined the Commonwealth in 199- even though it was never a part of British Empire due to its efforts against apartheid etc, etc.) Additional footnotes in the various sections could also clarify the dates for those countries which did not immediately enter the Commonwealth upon leaving the British Empire such South West Africa (which left along with South Africa but only joined upon independence in 1990) or countries which left the Commonwealth at some point (Ireland and Zimbabwe) or countries which left and rejoined (South Africa).72.27.58.16516:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","author":"72.27.58.165","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z-Commonwealth_of_Nations","replies":["c-72.27.92.79-2007-08-08T23:36:00.000Z-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
How come Mozambique hadn't been mentioned until now? Perhaps Mozambique is the exception that proves the rule. Or, failing that, how about Zimbabwe? It's under '1890-1980 Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe)'. Huh? Not only was it called 'Rhodesia', not 'Southern Rhodesia' from 1964 onwards (after Northern Rhodesia gained independence as 'Zambia'), but Zimbabwe was in the Commonwealth from 1980 until 2003. Those are two exceptions.
But, let's test it. How about Nauru, which is only a Special Member of the Commonwealth? Should that really be in italics when Nauru isn't a full member? What happens if Yemen enters the Commonwealth, as it has applied to do? Should Yemen be in talics, or should some new designation be concocted for countries that don't join upon independence, but do later? What happens if more countries (e.g. Rwanda, Cambodia, etc) join (they both applied in 1997) that weren't member of the Empire? Do they get exceptions like Mozambique? Why isn't there a footnote denoting that Pakistan or Fiji withdrew and rejoined? Or that Fiji is currently suspended? Or that the Eire was a member of the Empire (1922 - 1931) and the Commonwealth (1931 - 1949), but isn't any more? These exceptions aren't noted, nor are they accomodated. Your suggestion requires myriad footnotes and designations, when none is required.
This template implies that the Commonwealth and the Empire are the same and that they require simply italics, i.e. stylistics to differentiate. They're not the same, and the fact that this template treats them as such is POV. The Empire is in the past, so this template can be complete NOW. The fact that some POV-pushers, those that adopt Mugabesque "Commonwealth = Empire" attitudes, merge the two, when the template {{Commonwealth of Nations}} already exists, prevents that. Bastin 00:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Mozambique isn't the only Commonwealth member not mentioned. Nauru isn't mentioned either. That doesn't mean Mozambique proved anything other than the fact that it was overlooked until now, just like Nauru. As for Zimbabwe, it left the Commonwealth so it isn't in italics. Rhodesia was the name that the country called itself from 1965-1979, but it was never recognized....ever. Not even by South Africa. It tried to change its name to Rhodesia after the independence of Northern Rhodesia, but this name change was denied by the British. Hence why would this template list the country that declared independence (and considered itself outside of the Empire and the Commonwealth from 1970-1979 and was not recognized as a member of the Commonwealth in its own right from 1965-1970) as opposed to listing the colony that was recognized internationally as still being the colony of Southern Rhodesia de jure from 1890-1980 (but de facto from 1890-1965 and again from 1979-1980)?
Nauru is a special member, and a special member is still a member in some form. If you really want to be nitpicky Nauru could be added with a footnote.
If Yemen entered there would be no problem, since as you should know (based on your arguments thus far), that the majority of Yemen was a part of the British Empire at some point. It would be like Cameroon and South Africa (in the main list with a footnote on when it entered the Commonwealth, if really necessary).
As you should know, Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. Rwanda and Cambodia haven't joined (and are very unlikely to anyway), but if they did join it would probably be based on Rwanda being part of German East Africa (Tanganyika) which was occupied by the British and Belgians. If the probability of those coutries joining is low, and if the criteria for membership in the Commonwealth today is primarily based on past association with the British Empire, then why argue over it and create a fuss over them?
The reason there aren't footnotes denoting the instances of exit, reentry and suspension of Fiji and Pakistan is that suspended members are still members. I doubt notes really need to be added for countries that left the Commonwealth and reentered, possibly for those that left and never reentered or those that did not enter upon independence but the exit and reentry of Pakistan, Fiji and South Africa are not essential. Besides, in case you have forgotten, this is a template not a written article. It merely serves to allow readers to navigate and garner basic information. If templates covered every detail what would be the point of articles? Any reader can simply click one of the two links to the Commonwealth of Nations article to find out more on such things as suspension of membership and so on. If your going to complain about this aspect of the template, I expect you would do the same for the OAS template and its lack of information about Cuba's suspension in the organization? Or the Andean Community template's similar lack about Venezeula's moves from being a full member to being an associate member by moving to Mercosur? I also don't understand why you would expect something of this template, when the Commonwealth of Nations template has nothing on past members, Pakistan's exit and reentry or on the suspension of any of its members.
Have you ever considered that many of the various instances you pointed could have been oversight? We are talking about a hundred or so places scattered around the globe (some of them pretty obscure as well). Why not just add the ones that you've noticed have been forgotten.
You say that this template implies something that it was not intended to, however if you read the title in a straightforward fashion you will notice title uses the terms "British Empire" and "Commonwealth of Nations" with links to the two separate, but related entities. The fact that you are viewing the template otherwise is based on your own opinion. And the template clearly notes that current Commonwealth members are also former territories of the British empire. If current Commonwealth members are fomer territories (which is true, isn't it?) then how can the template be implying that the Commonwealth members are still part of the British Empire and that the Commonwealth and British Empire are one and the same? If the template did try to imply it, then it would have all Commonwealth members in the same style as the current territories (which it doesn't). As for any template that "can now be completed" because the "Empire is in the past", I suppose you've forgotten about the 10 inhabited territories still under the sovereignty of (but not a part of) the United Kingdom? Since in your view the Empire came to a definitive end, would you care to point out when that was exactly? 1931? 1948? 1980? 1997? And when did Bermuda become a part of the UK? What will happen when any or all of those territories become independent? We could debate this til we are blue in the face, but there would be little point since you could never give an exact date (since there isn't one). What's the problem if this template shows what became of the various former territories in simple italics?72.27.92.7923:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-08T23:36:00.000Z","author":"72.27.92.79","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-72.27.92.79-2007-08-08T23:36:00.000Z-72.27.58.165-2007-08-03T16:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Teemu_Leisti-2007-10-24T08:05:00.000Z-72.27.92.79-2007-08-08T23:36:00.000Z"]}}-->
I agree with Bastin's reasoning. I think the template on "Commonwealth of Nations" should be separate from that on "British Empire", and that neither should not try to encompass the other. The latter template could be used in articles and sections about history of nations and territories, and the former one in articles about modern nations and dependencies of modern nations. Teemu Leisti08:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-24T08:05:00.000Z","author":"Teemu Leisti","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Teemu_Leisti-2007-10-24T08:05:00.000Z-72.27.92.79-2007-08-08T23:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Where's Ireland seeing as it is the oldest occupied territory of the British Empire.
19:50, 29 July 2008
I came here wondering the same thing. It became part of the UK in 1801 so technically it ceased being a colony then, but from 1171-1801 it was a territory, overseas, governed by the British.--Lairor (talk) 14:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-06-22T14:07:00.000Z","author":"Lairor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lairor-2009-06-22T14:07:00.000Z-Ireland?","replies":[]}}-->
No, it was in personal union with the Kingdom of Great Britain, and never an overseas territory. Bastin 03:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
As I understand it, the term "British India" refers specifically to the territories under direct company/British rule, and excludes the princely states, which are thus not included in the list. But the princely states of India were clearly as much a part of the British empire as a number of other protectorates which are listed on the page (the High Commission territories of southern Africa and the Pacific, the Malay States, Egypt, the gulf states).
I also wonder if it wouldn't make sense to distinguish those parts of the British Empire directed from the India Office from those directed from the Colonial Office. Mandates might also be distinguished separately, as might pre-1931 dominions. This might be of more use than the continent based list. john k (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-04T09:33:00.000Z","author":"John Kenney","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-John_Kenney-2009-01-04T09:33:00.000Z-British_India","replies":[],"displayName":"john k"}}-->
Things missing
There were somewhere between 400-500 princely states in the British Raj. They certainly weren't an integral part of British India, but I don't think WP has an article for each of them, esp. not the petty ones in Gujarat. Perhaps listing either:
...or even just adding the link to Princely state somewhere? Also missing is the Hawai'ian protectorate. Night w (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-24T13:55:00.000Z","author":"Night w","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Night_w-2010-02-24T13:55:00.000Z-Things_missing","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-121.219.11.46-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Mauritius_and_Seychelles?-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-121.219.11.46-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z-Mauritius_and_Seychelles?"],"text":"Mauritius and Seychelles?","linkableTitle":"Mauritius and Seychelles?"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-121.219.11.46-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Mauritius_and_Seychelles?-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-121.219.11.46-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z-Mauritius_and_Seychelles?"],"text":"Mauritius and Seychelles?","linkableTitle":"Mauritius and Seychelles?"}-->
Where are Mauritius and Seychelles? I assumed I would find them under 'Africa', but to no avail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.11.46 (talk) 13:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z","author":"121.219.11.46","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-121.219.11.46-2010-09-27T13:58:00.000Z-Mauritius_and_Seychelles?","replies":[]}}-->
Іґнацій Кошембар-Лисковський Народився 3 лютого 1864(1864-02-03)Желіхово, Ґміна Новий Двур-Ґданський, Новодворський повіт, Поморське воєводство, Республіка ПольщаПомер 10 січня 1945(1945-01-10) (80 років)Мілянувек, Республіка ПольщаПоховання Повонзківський цвинтар і Cemetery in Milanówekd...
Tōkai-Hokuriku Expressway 東海北陸自動車道Route informationLength185 km[2] (115 mi)Existed1986[1]–presentMajor junctionsFromIchinomiya Junction in Ichinomiya, Aichi Meishin ExpresswayToOyabe-Tonami Junction in Oyabe and Tonami, Toyama Nōetsu Expressway Hokuriku Expressway LocationCountryJapanMajor citiesKakamigahara, Gifu, Seki, Gujō, Takayama, Hida, Nanto, Tonami Highway system National highways of Japan Expressways of Japan The Tōkai-Hokuriku Exp...
Elizabeth Armstrong Polo aquático Nome completo Elizabeth Anne Armstrong Apelido Betsey Nascimento 31 de janeiro de 1983 (40 anos)Ann Arbor, Michigan Nacionalidade norte-americana Medalhas Jogos Olímpicos Ouro Londres 2012 Equipe Prata Pequim 2008 Equipe Campeonatos Mundiais Ouro Melbourne 2007 Equipe Ouro Roma 2009 Equipe Jogos Pan-Americanos Ouro Rio 2007 Equipe Ouro Guadalajara 2011 Equipe Elizabeth Anne Betsey Armstrong (Ann Arbor, 31 de janeiro de 1983) é uma jogadora de pol...
Aspect of U.S. law, government, and military United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs the declaration of war against Japan on December 8, 1941 A declaration of war is a formal declaration issued by a national government indicating that a state of war exists between that nation and another. A document by the Federation of American Scientists gives an extensive listing and summary of statutes which are automatically engaged upon the United States declaring war.[1] For the Uni...
40th United States presidential inauguration Fourth presidential inauguration of Franklin D. RooseveltDateJanuary 20, 1945; 78 years ago (1945-01-20)LocationWhite House,Washington, D.C.Organized byJoint Congressional Committee on Inaugural CeremoniesParticipantsFranklin D. Roosevelt32nd president of the United States— Assuming officeHarlan F. StoneChief Justice of the United States— Administering oathHarry S. Truman34th vice president of the United States— Assuming off...
Philipp Schoch campeão olímpico Snowboard Representante Suíça Nascimento 12 de outubro de 1979 (44 anos)Winterthur, Zurique Nacionalidade suíço Compleição Peso: 85 kg • Altura: 1,82 m Nível Profissional Medalhas Competidor da Suíça Jogos Olímpicos Ouro Salt Lake City 2002 Slalom gigante paralelo Ouro Turim 2006 Slalom gigante paralelo Campeonato Mundial de Snowboard FIS Prata Arosa 2007 Slalom gigante paralelo Prata Arosa 2007 Slalom paralelo Philipp Schoch (Winterthur...
У Вікіпедії є статті про інших людей із прізвищем Гулак-Артемовський. Петро Петрович Гулак-Артемовський Народився 16 (27) січня 1790[1]Городище, нині Черкаська область, УкраїнаПомер 1 (13) жовтня 1865(1865-10-13)ХарківПоховання Перше міське кладовище (нині Молодіжний парк) в Харко...
artikel ini perlu dirapikan agar memenuhi standar Wikipedia. Tidak ada alasan yang diberikan. Silakan kembangkan artikel ini semampu Anda. Merapikan artikel dapat dilakukan dengan wikifikasi atau membagi artikel ke paragraf-paragraf. Jika sudah dirapikan, silakan hapus templat ini. (Pelajari cara dan kapan saatnya untuk menghapus pesan templat ini) Artikel ini tidak memiliki bagian pembuka yang sesuai dengan standar Wikipedia. Mohon tulis paragraf pembuka yang informatif sehingga pembaca dapa...
Ahmed Musa Informasi pribadiTanggal lahir 14 Oktober 1992 (umur 31)Tempat lahir Jos, NigeriaTinggi 1,70 m (5 ft 7 in)Posisi bermain Forward / WingerInformasi klubKlub saat ini Al-NassrNomor 13Karier junior Aminchi Football AcademyKarier senior*Tahun Tim Tampil (Gol)2008–2010 Aminchi Football Academy 0 (0)2008–2009 → JUTH (loan) 18 (4)2009–2010 → Kano Pillars (loan) 25 (18)2010–2012 VVV-Venlo 37 (8)2012–2016 CSKA Moscow 125 (42)2016– Leicester City 7 (2)Tim ...
Legal concept used in the legal systems of some countries Wehrmacht soldiers shooting Polish civilians in a reprisal, Bochnia, December 1939 Nazi crime or Hitlerite crime (Polish: Zbrodnia nazistowska or zbrodnia hitlerowska) is a legal concept used in the Polish legal system, referring to an action which was carried out, inspired, or tolerated by public functionaries of Nazi Germany (1933–1945) that is also classified as a crime against humanity (in particular, genocide) or other persecuti...
Artikel ini perlu diwikifikasi agar memenuhi standar kualitas Wikipedia. Anda dapat memberikan bantuan berupa penambahan pranala dalam, atau dengan merapikan tata letak dari artikel ini. Untuk keterangan lebih lanjut, klik [tampil] di bagian kanan. Mengganti markah HTML dengan markah wiki bila dimungkinkan. Tambahkan pranala wiki. Bila dirasa perlu, buatlah pautan ke artikel wiki lainnya dengan cara menambahkan [[ dan ]] pada kata yang bersangkutan (lihat WP:LINK untuk keterangan lebih lanjut...
Australian rules football and netball club KyabramNamesFull nameKyabram Football Netball ClubNickname(s)BombersClub detailsFounded1886 [1]Colours Black RedCompetitionGoulburn Valley Football LeaguePresidentPeter Croxford [2]CoachPaul Newman, Daniel Kent (assistant)[3]Premierships15 (1919, 1921, 1922, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1948, 1950, 1958, 1975, 1996, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2019)Ground(s)Kyabram Recreation ReserveUniforms Home The Kyabram Football Netball Club, nic...
2013 filmJerusalemFilm posterDirected byDaniel FergusonWritten byDaniel FergusonProduced by Jake Eberts Taran Davies George Duffield Daniel Ferguson Narrated byBenedict CumberbatchCinematographyReed SmootEdited by Jean-Marie Drot Bob Eisenhardt Doug O'Connor Music byMichael BrookProductioncompanies Cosmic Picture Arcane Pictures Distributed byNational Geographic EntertainmentRelease date September 20, 2013 (2013-09-20) Running time45 minutesCountries United States United Kingdo...
Penggambaran Aswang oleh sebuah seniman. Aswang (Asuwang) adalah makhluk mirip vampir dalam mitologi Filipina. Penjajah dari Spanyol menyebutkan bahwa aswang adalah makhluk yang paling ditakuti oleh rakyat Filipina.[1] Mitos aswang dikenal di seluruh wilayah Filipina, kecuali di daerah Ilocos.[2] Mitos ini sangat populer di daerah-daerah Visaya barat seperti Capiz, Iloilo dan Antique. Beberapa nama regional untuk aswang adalah tik-tik, wak-wak dan soc-soc. Aswang kadang-kadang...
The shoulder patch worn by the AFL's Kansas City Chiefs in the fourth AFL-NFL Championship game The Ten-Year AFL Patch is a shoulder patch adapted for use on American Football League (AFL) team uniforms. History During the entire 1969 professional football season, all NFL players wore a shoulder patch on their uniforms, reading 50 NFL, marking the 50 years which had passed since the league's initial organization. American Football League fan Ange Coniglio[1] petitioned the AFL owners ...
vte1948 Arab–Israeli War (southern front) Kfar Darom Nirim Yad Mordechai Negba Pleshet Nitzanim An-Far Be'erot Yitzhak Death to the Invader GYS Avak Yoav Beit Hanoun Separation Corridor Beersheba Naval battles Shmone Lot Assaf Horev Hill 86 Bir Thamila 'Auja Sinai Rafah Uvda Operation Avak (Hebrew: מִבְצָע אָבָק, Operation Dust) was a logistical and military operation conducted during the second truce of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and later by the Israeli Air Force (IAF). Its o...
Twinsburg StampingOperated1957–2010LocationTwinsburg, OhioCoordinates41°19′N 81°28′W / 41.31°N 81.47°W / 41.31; -81.47IndustryAutomotiveProductsStampingVolume1,500,000 sq ft (140,000 m2) [1]Address2000 East Aurora Road [1]Owner(s)ChryslerDefunct2010; 13 years ago (2010) Twinsburg Stamping was a Chrysler automotive stamping factory in Twinsburg, Ohio. The factory opened in 1957 and closed on July 31, 2010. It pr...
У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Спортивная (станция метро). «Спортивная»Первая линияСамарский метрополитен Район Советский Дата открытия 25 марта 1993 Тип колонная, мелкого заложения Глубина заложения, м ≈ 8 Количество платформ 1 Тип платформы островная Ф...
2013 video game by Shiro Games 2013 video gameEvolandDeveloper(s)Shiro GamesPlaydigious (iOS, Android)Publisher(s)Shiro GamesDesigner(s)Nicolas CannasseSébastien VidalProgrammer(s)Nicolas CannasseArtist(s)Etienne MakowskiJeremy VitryWriter(s)Nicolas CannasseSébastien VidalComposer(s)Camille SchoellEngineHeaps Platform(s)Microsoft WindowsOS XLinuxAndroidiOSNintendo SwitchPlayStation 4Xbox OneReleaseMicrosoft Windows, OS XWW: April 4, 2013Android, iOSWW: February 2, 2015LinuxWW: March 9,...
Special municipality in Taiwan Not to be confused with Taipei, the capital of Taiwan. Special municipality in Republic of ChinaNew Taipei City 新北市[I]Special municipalityClockwise from top: Panoramic view of the skyline of New Taipei City and the Mount Guanyin, Shifen Waterfall, TRA Pingxi Line, Bitan Suspension Bridge, Sunset of Tamsui, Jiufen Old Street at night and New Taipei City Government FlagLogoEtymology: Chinese: 新北; lit. 'New north'Coordinates: 25°00′...
