Redirect to:
Template documentationviewedithistorypurge This template is for when multiple sources used in an article are self-published. Self-published means that...
Click to read more »policy and hook checks out. I don't like the Ullidtz source, since it is selfpublished by a non-professional historian, but the facts are also sourced to better...
Click to read more »concern I have is the use of Skiddle as a source. Not only is it WP:SELFPUBLISHED but Skiddle is a for-profit ticket vendor and is not an independent...
Click to read more »(contribs) And the latest version uses a blog as a source. That fails WP:SELFPUBLISHED. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Given...
Click to read more »Template documentationviewedithistorypurge This template is intended to be placed at the top of sections of articles about living persons that may violate...
Click to read more »[self-published source] Template documentationviewedithistorypurge {{Self-published source|date=August 2026}} This is an inline citation annotation template...
Click to read more »unlikely copyvio. YouTube is not a reliable source, but may fall under WP:SELFPUBLISHED, as it's their own video; I'll ask a DYK admin in the next sentence...
Click to read more »expert and the blog should be considered reliable per policy at WP:SELFPUBLISHED which states "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable...
Click to read more »Buddhism in Burma, so I think he meets the reliability guidelines for WP:SELFPUBLISHED. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC) No non-bot edits...
Click to read more »publications and would therefore pass the criteria for the use of WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources which states " Self-published expert sources may be considered...
Click to read more »by a subject matter expert in order to use a source like this per WP:SELFPUBLISHED). I would think there would be other news sources for much of this same...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:SELFPUBLISHED. [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] ·...
Click to read more »of the article is cited to www.lighthousefriends.com which is a WP:SELFPUBLISHED WP:BLOG. I note that the blogger has done the kindness of providing...
Click to read more »somewhat WP:SECONDARY. In contrast, opera house websites are entirely WP:SELFPUBLISHED by the theatre, and they are not Wikipedia:Independent sources as they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Example (talk · contribs) — Jardine, Cassandra (5 August 2004). "The...
Click to read more »story. The fact that they are writing their own content makes it WP:SELFPUBLISHED in addition to having a financial COI. We shouldn't be using materials...
Click to read more »