Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
{{eciTemplate:Eci}} {{excess cite inlTemplate:Excess cite inl}} {{overciteTemplate:Overcite}} {{over-citationTemplate:Over-citation}} {{citekillTemplate:Citekill}}...
Click to read more »{{eciTemplate:Eci}} {{excess cite inlTemplate:Excess cite inl}} {{overciteTemplate:Overcite}} {{over-citationTemplate:Over-citation}} {{citekillTemplate:Citekill}}...
Click to read more »substantial copyedit to the article, including trimming the citations per WP:OVERCITE. These changes were big enough that I'd appreciate it if the nominator...
Click to read more »please use {{Excessive citations inline}}, which also has the shortcut {{overcite}}. This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor...
Click to read more »{{eciTemplate:Eci}} {{excess cite inlTemplate:Excess cite inl}} {{overciteTemplate:Overcite}} {{over-citationTemplate:Over-citation}} {{citekillTemplate:Citekill}}...
Click to read more »sentences, the second one of which is cited. I guess I could violate WP:OVERCITE for DYK if asked, but I don't see why there is a need.--3family6 (Talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) It is interesting. Just wanted to say that it suffers a bit from WP:OVERCITE. It is distracting to read through. Bruxton (talk) 14:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »laser treatments" section, but I don't understand why there is so much WP:OVERCITE. My guess is because the article was expanded from an older version and...
Click to read more »that CLOP is not an issue. Not a DYK issue, but some areas suffer from WP:OVERCITE also consider the citations in the lead may not be needed per WP:LEADCITE...
Click to read more »March 2023 (UTC) Comment about the article. The article suffers from WP:OVERCITE - one example is the last sentence in the article which has five citations...
Click to read more »please use {{Excessive citations inline}}, which also has the shortcut {{overcite}}. This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor...
Click to read more »are not esp DYK related but good to review. The article suffers from WP:OVERCITE and MOS:LEADCITE; and I do not think we normally do awards/decorations...
Click to read more »please use {{Excessive citations inline}}, which also has the shortcut {{overcite}}. This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor...
Click to read more »Diplomacy Initiative went viral? I also suggest pairing down the excessive citations WP:OVERCITE, especially in the lead sentence which has 8 citations....
Click to read more »(UTC). New enough; long enough; well-cited, even perhaps to the point of overciting a bit (just a bit); hook is short enough and pretty interesting; QPQ valid...
Click to read more »that the four sources cited in the music video section may come across as OVERCITE. It might be better to either cite each source in the respective sentences...
Click to read more »copyvio, BLP or other issues. Everything is cited: there is in fact some WP:OVERCITE going on, particularly with lead citations and the third paragraph of "political...
Click to read more »violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - n Other problems: - overcited QPQ: - Not done Overall: Way to many citations. Some close paraphrasing...
Click to read more »plagiarism (mostly just a prose conversion of the sources) and arguably overcited. I would go with the original hook, since the ALT is less interesting...
Click to read more »Everything in the article is cited to the next ref listed to avoid chronic overciting (which I used to be very bad about) so a paragraph with only one citation...
Click to read more »(offline) on good faith! Other sourcing issues seem to be resolved; no OVERCITE and every source I can read seems appropriately used. Hook's good. Kingsif...
Click to read more »correct per the other cites I could check. So WP:AGF. I corrected some overciting on the page. Everything else looks fine, though. Thank you for your work...
Click to read more »to the preceding sentence, but will it look good? It might be a form of overcite. While I myself authored the essay Wikipedia:Why most sentences should...
Click to read more »violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Other problems: - Remove the WP:OVERCITE after "conferences" Hook eligibility: Cited: Interesting: Other problems:...
Click to read more »@AdmiralAckbar1977 and Toadboy123: A few thoughts. The article suffers badly from WP:OVERCITE. We should aloo try to avoid citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. The...
Click to read more »editorial choice, but it's my opinion that citing every sentence breaks the WP:OVERCITE guideline, which although isn't a part of the MOS, it is something I agree...
Click to read more »article, I don't see any outstanding article issues, although it might be overcited in some places; are all of those citations really needed? Sources checks...
Click to read more »want or add in more repeat citations if required, just didn't want to overcite. (Just might have to wait for Tuesday for me to check the Paul & Seneca...
Click to read more »sentences having two or three citations. More would be bordering on "overciting" in my opinion, since these seem not as controversial as what gets by...
Click to read more »paragraph. I didn't cite the sentence immediately after the claim to avoid WP:OVERCITE since I would be using the same sources later. Was this OK? ComputerJA...
Click to read more »no QPQ needed. I did initially have some slight concerns over minor overciting, but I don't think that's an issue. @Dudzcar: only issue I have is that...
Click to read more »about the hook fact WP:DYKCRIT#3b. The hook in the article suffers from WP:OVERCITE which can be distracting. Thank you for nominating. Bruxton (talk) 19:45...
Click to read more »being Shi'i/Sunni and it attributing the title to Fatimah. A case of WP:OVERCITE if you will. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC) The article...
Click to read more »Copperfield and footnote #6 too. I've repeated footnote #6 but this is overciting IMO, as the quote obviously comes from the novel. Andrew🐉(talk) 23:03...
Click to read more »April 2022 (UTC) Hook fact needs to be directly cited + try to avoid overciting Kingoflettuce (talk) 11:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC) HenryTemplo, I have added...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC) @Cl3phact0: Some areas suffer from WP:OVERCITE. I also find sentences like this to be a style of citations that makes...
Click to read more »need further citation, otherwise we would be moving into the realms of WP:OVERCITE. They would need citing if for example there was a hook saying "9 astronomers...
Click to read more »thanks for the review but I respectfully don't think it's a case of overciting and would prefer to leave the cites as they are. It might be more aesthetically...
Click to read more »comes from French" examples with attributes. This section is in my view overcited and cluttered, but that was because I added them in for not being cited...
Click to read more »As a matter of style (not DYK requirement) some things suffer from WP:OVERCITE. For instance in "Furniture material and in tents" there are two sentences...
Click to read more »green tick, except for two small things: @Doug Coldwell: [1] There is WP:OVERCITE in some cases, just 2 or 3 WP:RS are enough (or just fold the various sources...
Click to read more »The length and notability issues have been resolved. Suffers now from WP:OVERCITE but that's not a disqualifier. QPQ is not needed. 3family6 (Talk to me...
Click to read more »of concern, I request that you please close this review, and remove the Overcite tag from the Rights of nature article. Al83tito (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2020...
Click to read more »see that DYK is trying to become the equivalent of GA or something, but overciting is not a problem that a sub-project concerned with getting a few views...
Click to read more »covered by the citation at the end of each paragraph, and I didn't want to overcite unnecessarily. If you have any more specfic suggestions, I think I can...
Click to read more »current version. I'll also take a look at improving the article based on WP:OVERCITE. Skeet Shooter (talk) 04:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Problems with self-published...
Click to read more »but what precisely is preventing it from being promoted? That it is overcited? Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »them negative as much as a suggestion. Honestly, I think the piece was overcited. I did read the passage and thought it matched the citations listed. I...
Click to read more »bringing it up. As I've already mentioned, you're also engaging in WP:OVERCITE which also impacts readability. You don't need five citations to tell us...
Click to read more »referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s) in the Results header. times Used for referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s)...
Click to read more »referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s) in the Results header. times Used for referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s)...
Click to read more »referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s) in the Results header. times Used for referencing to avoid overciting. Will place the reference(s)...
Click to read more »