Template:Importance inline
Wikipedia:Notability does not determine relevance of article content. It only determines whether or not we will have an entire article about a topic. For an explanation of the difference, see WP:NOTREL. |
If you are attempting to flag content in an article on the basis of its importance or relevance to the subject, please use one of the templates below, as appropriate:
{{Trivia}} – Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).{{Trivia section}} – Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.{{Unfocused}} – for an article which lacks focus or has no particular topic.{{Off topic}} – For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article{{Content}} – For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.{{Importance section}} – For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.{{Importance inline}} – For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.{{Better source example}} – For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.{{Relevance inline}} – For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.{{Non sequitur}} – For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.{{Overly detailed}} – For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.{{Summarize section}} – For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.{{Example farm}} – For excessive use of examples.{{Too many see alsos}} – For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.{{Self-sourcing examples}} – For an article or section with poorly cited popular culture examples.{{In popular culture}} – For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.{{Fiction trivia}} (or {{In-universe}}) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).{{Long plot}}, {{All plot}} – For excessively detailed plot summaries.{{Cleanup book}}, {{Cleanup film}} – For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).{{Game trivia}} – For too much gaming-related trivia.{{MOSLOW}} – For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order{{Cleanup university}}, {{Cleanup school}} – For excessive detail about an educational institution.{{Famous}} – For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.{{Localist}} – For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.{{Prose}} – Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.{{Cleanup list}} – For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.{{List to table}} – For use where a table would be better than a list.Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.