{{subst:GATable}} into a review of a good article nomination, or an individual reassessment, to provide a review table which displays the current good article
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
| 2c. it contains no original research. | ||
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
| 7. Overall assessment. | ||
{{subst:GATable}}
The first column uses the same syntax as {{GAList}} and {{GAList2}} to indicate the current status of the article with respect to each criterion, as a parameter for {{GATable/item}}.
y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol: n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol: ?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh, idk all produce a question symbol: wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol: hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol: neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol: If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "Pending". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).
An initial rating and comment for each criterion can be specified as follows.
{{subst:GATable |1a= |1acom= |1b= |1bcom= |2a= |2acom= |2b= |2bcom= |2c= |2ccom= |2d= |2dcom= |3a= |3acom= |3b= |3bcom= |4= |4com= |5= |5com= |6a= |6acom= |6b= |6bcom= |7= |7com=}}
In vertical format:
{{subst:GATable
| overcom =
| 1a =
| 1acom =
| 1b =
| 1bcom =
| 2a =
| 2acom =
| 2b =
| 2bcom =
| 2c =
| 2ccom =
| 2d =
| 2dcom =
| 3a =
| 3acom =
| 3b =
| 3bcom =
| 4 =
| 4com =
| 5 =
| 5com =
| 6a =
| 6acom =
| 6b =
| 6bcom =
| 7 =
| 7com =
}}
Add |instructions=yes to add hidden text with reviewer instructions (from {{GAN/instructions}}). Any other or no value (the default) turns off the instructions.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.