Talk:Zero
This change does not quite make sense (given the circumstances). Please talk about such edits before acting upon them. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:15, 9
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • 0 Because this page is not heavily watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:0 |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Makes no sense
This change does not quite make sense (given the circumstances). Please talk about such edits before acting upon them. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Zero disambiguation makes more sense. It makes much more sense than your useless revert. If somebody is looking for the actual number they would search for 0 and not zero. Zero is the name of many different things other than a number. Gune (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, that's sort of the purpose of Zero (disambiguation). The article Zero is about the primary topic, which is the number. If a page move is what you're asking for, file a request at WP:RPM, though I doubt you'll have much luck with that. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
No. I'm talking about the redirect. It should redirect to the disambiguation page and not the actual number since there are many more uses for the word zero than just a number. In fact most people wouldn't even search zero if they were looking for the number. They would instead search for 0. Gune (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Get WP:CONSENSUS then. That's all there is to it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Now you apparently think you have consensus to keep it directed to the number 0? Do you always like to make shit up? Gune (talk) 03:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Watch the language. And again, if you care so much, start a move discussion. Guess WP:WPDAB should know about this ... Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
In Our Time
The BBC programme In Our Time presented by Melvyn Bragg has an episode which may be about this subject (if not moving this note to the appropriate talk page earns cookies). You can add it to "External links" by pasting * {{In Our Time|Zero|p004y254}}. Rich Farmbrough, 03:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC).
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.