Talk:Xilam

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking / French This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. This article is supported by the French cinema task force. Animation: European Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the European animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

See this article for a history of the company. It was founded in 1999, bought the assets of Gaumont Multimedia, and has (as far as I can tell) always been independent of Gaumont. That it traces its history back to an executive from Gaumont is meaningless to whether this company is legally related to that company. I would need to see a reliable source that states that this is a subsidiary, because everything that I've seen so far as said that it's not. Of course, it's possible that I have misunderstood the way that French corporate law works... still, there should be a reliable source for this kind of statement. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I need someone to add the page for the new shows on xilam animation. Crazybob2014 (talk)

I heard that Xilam is producing an animated reboot series of Mr. Magoo, a character that's part of the Classic Media library that's owned by DreamWorks Animation. Xilam can't produce a Mr. Magoo TV series if DreamWorks Animation isn't going to be involved with the project. So therefore, the new Mr. Magoo show by Xilam should be a co-production of Xilam (France) and DreamWorks Animation (United States). --2601:2C0:C280:21A0:8C84:59D1:E805:D53F (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I know Xilam and Nelvana never actually DID a collaboration together before, but I wish they did. --2601:2C0:C280:21A0:8C84:59D1:E805:D53F (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

They should. --ChowderRulez (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Their own website states that they have multiple studios, so saying "location" is inaccurate, even with the summarizing rule in mind.--Delibirda (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply