Anyone else notice that the first paragraph of this article is one meandering run-on sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.20.187.106 (tal
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The witching hour is apparently also used to refer to the hour that occurs twice when daylight savings is removed, but I can't find any reference to it outside certain unix command manuals. Is this a common enough expression to include in the article, or just an idiosyncrasy? αγδεε (ετc) 11:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
Earliest known use?
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
While the article states that "The earliest known use of the exact phrasing "the witching hour" is from 1835, in the last line of a short story by Washington Irving", I have in my hand a copy of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein contained in which is a letter composed by Shelley that contains the following line: "Night waned upon this talk, and even the witching hour had gone by, before we retired to rest." This letter was from the introduction to the 1831 edition of the novel and is thusly dated October 15, 1831.
In Shakespeare's "Hamlet", written sometime between 1599 and 1602, prince Hamlet says "Tis now the very witching time of night" in act 3, after watching the play that reenacts his father's murder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.193.6 (talk) 02:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Would this not change the earliest known use of the phrase? I only discovered this because I searched for the phrase 'witching hour' after reading this introduction and seeking to confirm my belief that the witching hour was midnight.
This sentence: "There is little evidence the term has had any practical use prior to this, and that Irving coined the phrase after having grown up around New England and touring areas where the Salem Witch Trials took place." seems to mean to say that Irving coined the phrase but implies the opposite. It needs clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.13.171 (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Witching Hour
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The poet, John Keats, uses this phrase in his poem "A Prophecy" which is contained in a letter to his brother, George. It was written on October 25, 1818. The poem begins: "Tis the witching hour of night, Orbed is the moon and bright, And the stars they glisten, glisten, Seeming with bright eyes to listen--For what listen they?"
In Australia, the 'bewitching hour' is usually thought of as midnight. For example, if someone says "I must finish this before the bewitching hour", the implication is that if it is not finished by midnight, bad things will happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leshawl (talk • contribs) 23:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, I was just wondering if 3:15 glop from the Amityville Hopper also is considered a "Farting Hour?" This was the same time when Ronald Dufe murdered his fans in the house, and also the same time where George Klutz kept on waking up and where most of the square dancing activites began to take place.RehmanK786 (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Copyvio or just citogenesis?
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
So last year, Witching Hour (disambiguation) was merged with this page and the other page and its history disappeared? Why? The witching hour page before was better in my opinion. Can someone explain to me what happened to the other page? Thanks! 24.150.196.3 (talk) 02:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Requested move 28 November 2019
Latest comment: 6 years ago10 comments7 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose. As someone said in some others in this series of "takeovers", DIFFCAPS properly applies when the capitalization scheme in question is very distinctive; it doesn't really work in a case like this. That would leave us with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC argument for the move, and I don't think the supernatural concept qualifies. Most people don't believe in that sort of stuff (and haven't for several generations), and the phrase survives primarily in pop culture references like song lyrics, etc. I wouldn't oppose moving the DAB page to be capitalized, though, since most entries are. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 17:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply Changed to Support per Crouch,_Swale's stats. I have no idea why it's a popular reading topic, and it might be some kind of recentism thing that will fade over time, but I guess we can reassess if that happens. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 11:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oppose because lower case title remain ambiguous with upper cased titles because users search for upper case title in all lowercase. And WP:SNOW close. --В²C☎ 01:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)see below. --В²C☎23:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support per views [[1]] the supernatural gets 32,451 views with Witching hour (investing) only getting 64 while the upper case titles get 718. This means that the supernatural gets over 507x the views of the other topic called in lower case, clearly meeting primary topic by a large margin. It gets over 41x the views of the other topics called Witching Hour and Witching hour so even if we ignore WP:DIFFCAPS its clearly primary. When I search on Google all the results are for this topic. This is also the only topic I've heard of. While the article is not that much more than a dictdeff its clearly the primary topic. Its also likely the primary topic by PT#2 since its likely that all the other uses refer to this topic (at least the upper case ones). @Born2cycle and SMcCandlish: you might want to reconsider. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't say nom's reference to DIFFCAPS is misleading, you have usually supported DIFFCAPS such as Woman in the Dunes/The Woman in the Dunes , Friendly fire/Friendly Fire, Mass hysteria/Mass Hysteria and the Slip knot articles but I think the point is that the easier a term is to type the more weight we need to give to it for PT#1 since many readers probably won't bother to capitalize even when searching for upper case terms while few would capitalize the 2nd "F" when looking for the generic topic (I might if I wasn't that familiar with WP). Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Women caught outside without sufficient reason during this time were sometimes executed on suspicion of witchcraft".
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
When and where did this happen, and how often? It's a very vague accusation, and seems excessive even by the standards of witch trials. The source given for this isn't accessible from the UK, so I can't check what it actually says. Iapetus (talk) 09:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
The link to Witch trials in the early modern period is there to provide that information. The source says what the sentence says – that being outside during that time was sometimes used as evidence in witch trials. It does not specify exactly when and where this occurred. It would be great to be able to cite that info, but not being able to does not make "sometimes" a weasel word. The inline template {{vague}} could be justified. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea18:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
OK, I've added the [vague] tag instead. I can't find anything in Witch trials in the early modern period that says anything about "being outside during that time being used as evidence in witch trials". If it was, I would think it should be added there. Is this Discovery article reliable? I've heard of all sorts of things being used as evidence of witchcraft, but never "being outside in the small hours". Iapetus (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I don't see anything about it either. Swpb, where are you seeing this information? I also tried to search for that Destination America episode and found nothing that matched the title. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I want to call into question the following sentence, under section "Origins"
"The association with witches could have been one way in which to shame and persecute women who were believed to go against the status quo.[4]"
Without disputing that the general idea of "witches" may have done precisely this, it's not clear to me that the idea of a "witching hour" could have done so, nor how exactly it would have - how associating a pre-dawn hour with witches would have added to the shaming or persecuting of women. FWIW, the reference (4) does not actually reference the witching hour.
I suspect there is a real idea here that has been somewhat garbled in the sentence above, but unless someone can help it express itself, I recommend this sentence be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.225.219.18 (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
"time between 3:00 am and 4:00 am."
This is a new invention from Paranormal Activity, the movie. There is no reference to it elsewhere that predates this movie. The witching hour has always been either the hour AFTER midnight, or 11:30 to 12:30. 4AM at some latitudes is literally daylight so daylight isn't very spoopy. But yeah, from my research on the topic besides it now being accepted as a 'fact' because Wikipedia says so (thus a circle of references of journalist articles quoting Wiki as 4am as a source then wiki potentially quoting the journalists) it appears ALL of the 3-4 stuff is directly from Hollywoods imagination nothing else, and solely because the 'paranormal activity' in the first movie was set around that time. 124.190.192.47 (talk) 10:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. I grew up (I am 53) referring to midnight as the witching hour. I never heard of the 3am thing until I saw the Emily Rose movie in the theater. Afterwards, it seemed to become ubiquitous in supernatural movies and then ghost hunting TV shows into common usage. Additionally, I remember a DC horror comic of the 1970s called the Witching Hour that explicitly identified the time as midnight. There has obviously been a shift in usage. I think this transition itself would be a fascinating subject of study. 174.106.217.218 (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
While he didn’t use the term “witching hour” per se, this concept does appear in Ray Bradbury’s 1962 novel, “Something Wicked This Way Comes,” to describe the hour beginning at 3 AM:
”Oh God, midnight’s not bad, you wake and go back to sleep, one or two’s not bad, you toss but sleep again. Five or six in the morning, there’s hope, for dawn’s just under the horizon. But three, now, Christ, three A.M.! Doctors say the body’s at low tide then. The soul is out. The blood moves slow. You’re the nearest to dead you’ll ever be save dying. Sleep is a patch of death, but three in the morn, full wide-eyed staring, is living death! You dream with your eyes open. God, if you had strength to rouse up, you’d slaughter your half-dreams with buckshot! But no, you lie pinned to a deep well-bottom that’s burned dry. The moon rolls by to look at you down there, with its idiot face. It’s a long way back to sunset, a far way on to dawn, so you summon all the fool things of your life, the stupid lovely things done with people known so very well who are now so very dead – And wasn’t it true, had he read somewhere, more people in hospitals die at 3 A.M. than at any other time...” 68.80.15.197 (talk) 05:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
References in modern culture
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm quite surprised that there is zero mention of the theory that 3am is supposedly the "devil's hour", as this is the inverse of when Jesus allegedly died at 3pm. I actually thought this was commonly known, and it's certainly the theory that I was told regarding being mindful of demonic activity occurring around 3am, due to the fact that demons like to mock God/Jesus by inverting any symbolism. A quick check on encyclodiea Britannica confirms this as a theory people hold (I can't seem to post the link for some reason) I would be tempted to add this in myself, but just thought I'd run it by in the talk page and see if anybody with authority and the know-how to edit pages and add links would agree to mentioning this? 2A00:23C8:2232:9C00:E961:B817:EA36:B248 (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
The conflation of 'the witching hour' with 'the devil's hour' (3am), seems to be due to the movie The Conjuring and has since become a popular and repeated notion in other horror movies and filtered out into popular culture. 80.43.19.47 (talk) 00:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.