Talk:Which Witch
Shouldn't this article cover some of drama that occured around the time when the production flopped brutally in London? --Bjs5005 (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2008 (
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Unbalanced Article
Shouldn't this article cover some of drama that occured around the time when the production flopped brutally in London? --Bjs5005 (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely agree, the article is ridiculously positive and portrays the musical as a huge artistic and commercial success, while here in the UK at least it is a byword for an ill-conceived and disastrous production. Much of the English in the article has a certain 'Scandinavian' phrasing to it and I can't help suspecting that the original producers or their associates have something to do with it. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation
I came to this page looking for info on the 1970s kids' board game. Could be worth a disambiguation page, at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.240.116 (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- This article should be a disambig, with links to Which Witch? (play) and Which Witch (game). They should NOT both be lumped in the same article. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation page exist as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Which_Witch_(disambiguation) with links to both the play and the board game.Bjs5005 (talk) 13:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Not objective
Not objective at all. What about all the fight between Adrian and Bjørnov and the financial trouble, the bankrupcy? Edit or delete. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.