Talk:Walk forward optimization

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please guide me, as I would love to have more reviews and guidance regarding this topic. As this is a valuable topic for the financial world.

I am willing to put in examples for the walk forward optimization, please give me more time, am sure to do something in 15 days time.

Am willing to make the proper changes, please give me time, and I am accommodating the changes to make the article conform to your standards.. Please guide me and sincere thanks for your valuable help and guidance...

You almost left it a bit late... Anyone can object to a PROD (including yourself - it's not a speedy delete), either by improving it, or by adding something here, explaining what you will do. As such I have removed the PROD for you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Though you have advised me as under: You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

I am hoping that the page comes up to your standard and you are willing to edit the above "deletion" section and consider my request for some time. I did prefer that way and please let me know if I can contribute better and help me to be a contributor to wikipedia.

Sincere thanks once more..

Sincere thanks, Ronhjones... Am sincerely grateful for your faith and guidance. Although, I admit that I was not able to follow up earlier and shall try my best to follow your guidelines.

Sincere thanks once more..

Sincere thanks for your guidance, shall look into the matter. Please give a week or so, please.. Moreover, if it is possible to move it back to my own userspace to make it a better article before going live.. please do so.. Sincere thanks and apologies once more.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruthiecameryn (talk • contribs) 21:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

in the ===Conclusion=== i have something you need to add in my opinion:

Hence, the out-of-sample data plays a crucial role in determining the validity and reliability of the system and is a realistic estimate of how a system should work in real markets, althoug some valid Professionals in the field of Algo Trading in Finance will beg to differ [Marcos Lopez De Prado, Advances in Financial Machine Learning, 2018]. Yossi87 (talk) 11:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

From http://www.vworker.com/RentACoder/misc/BidRequests/ShowBidRequest.asp?lngBidRequestId=1681138

"I have tried to have some Wikipedia entries set up on various topic. The problem is that the articles are not following there rules, see below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk_Forward_Optimization

You are bidding to help make this article meet there standard while still be able to generate traffic to TradersStudio.com

This could turn into long term work working on Wikipedia articles." User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I changed the first two paragraphs. I believe it is now more concise and clear. Next steps: 1) I'd like to propose to delete the rest of the page except: "See also" and "References". Walk-forward is a simple concept explained in the first 4 lines. Someone made it too complex. Further, the current text is confusing and seems like written by an author paid by the size of text. 2) I propose to add the picture from Robert Pardo book, page 252. Can someone help? 3) I will look for references regarding issues of walk-forward testing. I know there is a bias against slower trading strategies, but I'll need to do more research in this area. Seaman4516 (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Following reference leads to a 404 page: https://www.allbusiness.com/business-finance/equity-funding-stock/166504-1.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.72.59.182 (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply