Talk:WTGS

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be m

Talk:WTGS

GA review

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Passed. Locust member (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:WTGS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 19:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 17:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


This is quite local so I figure I'll give this a review! Locust member (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
  • serving as the Fox affiliate for the Savannah, Georgia, area - I believe the comma after "Georgia" can be removed
  • Sea of blue issue with unincorporated Chatham County, Georgia - "unincorporated" is not seen anywhere in the article, just a mention of Chatham County. Can it be discarded?
    • Definitely.
  • Lowcountry can be linked in lead
  • could we specify Charleston, South Carolina, so the reader knows which city we are referring to, without needed to click the wikilink?
  • Why does dozens need to be in quotations?
  • The article's sole image is in public domain due to not reaching the threshold of originality; rationale looks good
  • As I am unfamiliar with this genre of articles I'm not sure what I could do as a reviewer to increase broadness, but this looks good scope-wise (when comparing it to your endless other GAs)
  • Copyvio is insanely low at 2.0%. Passes easily
  • The article is written from NPOV. No issues at WP:WORDSTOWATCH
  • Mark [38] as dead (address is no longer up)
  • References all seem fine.
  • Stability is more than passable

Spot-check

  • Plantation Cablevision also denied having wanted WTGS to pay for access to its cable system. [10]
  • The new ownership moved the station's facilities south from Hardeeville to a site in Chatham County, Georgia, which would not be limited by height restrictions on a tower and be more centrally located for advertising sales purposes. [20]
  • (equivalent to $5,039 in 2021) - not seeing this in [1] (since it is from 1987) and the year is four years outdated.
    • The way that inflation templates work is a bit different. There is a missing standard footnote, and I have changed it to use the latest available year, which is 2023, and automatically update.
  • During Super Bowl XLVIII, WTGS notably aired a two-minute long advertisement by local personal injury lawyer Jamie Casino, which featured a thriller-styled retelling of how he stopped representing "cold-hearted villains" to avenge the shooting death of his brother Michael Biancosino in 2012, culminating with Casino digging through a grave with a sledgehammer. The ad gained media attention following the game as a viral video, and while the station did not provide exact numbers, a WTGS spokesperson stated that the ad was its most expensive advertising sale in history. - both refs here look good
  • Taking good faith for references I cannot access.

@Sammi Brie: and @Wizzito: Nice work here! I am putting this review On hold for now. I have very limited issues with this article's current state. Let me know once you have implemented the changes. Locust member (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.