Whereas in the past, WBOH operated semi-independently, what's left of it (West Central Ohio CW) is a digital sub-channel of WLIO. While some digital subchannels
| WLIO has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 21, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from WLIO appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Whereas in the past, WBOH operated semi-independently, what's left of it (West Central Ohio CW) is a digital sub-channel of WLIO. While some digital subchannels have their own articles, I do not believe that it is justified in this case. In my opinion, the WBOH article could be transformed into a subsection of the WLIO article. --AlexDW 16:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
FCC records do not show virtual channel 8 for this station, but virtual channel 35. (For WOHL-CD, they show no virtual channel.) Added "citation needed" tag to body. --Chaswmsday (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Stations with similar mismatches: WOAY-TV, KVIQ, KCVU/KBVU.
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations#Dubious virtual channels & odd branding. --Chaswmsday (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 19:26, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Sorry this took a bit, but I did promise I'd hit this one up. Will give a review hopefully very soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the subject.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses no fair use files.
-Looks good
-Is there any reason only two people are listed?
-Looks solid. Not much more to say, it's very well done coverage and prose wise.
-Reviewed 14 random sources from the article: 48, 32, 45, 47, 16, 1, 54, 27, 33, 12, 42, 36, 35, 28. Can't check 16, 33 but assuming good faith. What is the reliability of RabbitEars? Source 28 also does not give any of the specified info on Bratton, only stating he has been arrested and associated information. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by Juxlos talk 00:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 07:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.