Talk:Voting

I question whether increased ignorance of the largely artificial alignment of the party system would be bad for the health of the polity! But that's a question

Talk:Voting

the necessity of conventional wisdom

A series of studies coming out of the University of Michigan in the 1950s and 1960s argued that many voters lack a basic understanding of current issues, the liberal–conservative ideological dimension, and the relative ideological dilemma that are important to understand when making political decisions.

I question whether increased ignorance of the largely artificial alignment of the party system would be bad for the health of the polity! But that's a question that likely belongs elsewhere. —Tamfang (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Voting

Definition of voting 23.88.204.195 (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

See our article Voting. —Tamfang (talk) 23:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Religious Views section

Although the religious views section tells us about groups that do not vote, and some that do, it doesn't explain why the groups that don't vote don't vote. The Scriptural basis for not voting comes from Torah Law, specifically Deuteronomy 17:14-15 and other New Testament Scriptures that identify our citizenship from heaven such as Philippians 3:20, 2 Corinthians 5:20 and that Yahshua the Messiah, who is to be our example, would never participate in elections. I'm thinking of adding a succinct explanation as to this in the article but let me know if anyone has any feedback. In Citer (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.