Talk:Vectoring nozzle

Don't know who wrote this stub, but he/she is dead wrong. In the well-researched "Air War South Atlantic", by Jeffery Ethell and Alfred Price, they have this t

Talk:Vectoring nozzle

Viffing in the Falklands

Don't know who wrote this stub, but he/she is dead wrong. In the well-researched "Air War South Atlantic", by Jeffery Ethell and Alfred Price, they have this to say (pg 175): "Because there was scarcely any fighter-versus-fighter combat, Sea Harrier pilots never used VIFF (thrust Vectored In Forward Flight) while engaging enemy aircraft." And later on the same page: "Once Sea Harrier pilots had enemy aircraft in sight, the usually pounced from above, closed rapidly to within missile firing range, and loosed off a Sidewinder." The Army's version of the Harrier was not used in any air to air combat during that campaign. As far as I have been able to determine, VIFF has never been used by Harriers in air-to-air combat in any conflict. 98.255.85.245 (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

In addition, the two paragraphs about the use of thrust vectoring would be better at home in the thrust vectoring page.--Jean-Marc Liotier (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


This commenter is absolutely correct. There were no "dogfights" during the Falklands war. Maneuvering typically meant making a large, high-speed turn to get behind the Argentine attacker and loosing a heat-seeking missile once the enemy's hot tailpipes could be targeted. Read Squadron Leader Sharky Ward's book "Sea Harrier: a Maverick at War" and you'll find not a single reference to VIFFing or dogfighting.173.62.15.212 (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merging the nozzles section from the thrust vectoring page

The "Nozzles" section in the thrust vectoring page has a high level that I believe would have a better home in the Vectoring nozzles page. Is anyone interested in merging it to this page ?--Jean-Marc Liotier (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

definition for vectoring nozzle

The definition is incorrect and misleading since it focusses on only one of many capabilities. I have deleted it.User:Pieter1963|Pieter1963]] (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Except you have left the article without a lead definition. --ChetvornoTALK 08:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.