Talk:Variety

Just on first reading, I think we should go either with linguistic style and linguistic variety, or just style and variety, for consistency's sake. -- Hephaesto

Talk:Variety
Linguistics

Just on first reading, I think we should go either with linguistic style and linguistic variety, or just style and variety, for consistency's sake. -- Hephaestos 03:41 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)

You have a point there!
I was initially thinking of "Variety (linguistics)", then of "Variety of language", but didn't finish my thought. I wrote "linguistic style" since I was tired and couldn't think clearly... -- Ruhrjung 03:48 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)

I am sorry Ruhrjung, but upon consideration I have nothing to contribute on what variety should be called. Best be honest rather than invent some idiotic suggestion out of thin air. -- Cimon Avaro on a pogo-stick 23:06 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Mathematical Varieties

Discussion about listing various types of mathematical varieties.

I think when mathematicians talk of a variety they mean an Algebraic variety significantly more than Variety (universal algebra). On that note, there are many many types of algebraic varieties: Severi variety, Abelian variety, Albanese variety, Chow variety, Picard variety, Toric variety, Flag variety, Fano variety, Jacobian variety, Shimura variety, Bott-Samelson variety, Deligne-Lusztig variety, Spherical variety, Schubert variety, Calabi-Yao variety, Veronese variety, Secant variety, Cactus variety, Segre variety, Severi-Brauer variety, Complex-analytic variety, etc. Should this become a subcategory page, or just included here? -- Mahrud 07:45 21 Dec 2019 (UTC)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.