Talk:Value proposition
A reviewer removed the following reference from the article. Although no explanation was given, the same reviewer removed similar references as a conflict of in
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Moved from article to talk page
A reviewer removed the following reference from the article. Although no explanation was given, the same reviewer removed similar references as a conflict of interest. See however, the external link that remains in the article.
The Wikipedia policy he referenced implies that anyone who specializes in a topic may have a conflict of interest and recommends moving content with potential conflicts of interest to the talk page--which now follows. The following reference describes the requirements for a compelling value proposition.[1]
- ^ bbmarketingplus.com/blog/2008/11/05/capturing-buyers-attention-what-makes-a-value-proposition-compelling/ Capturing Buyers' Attention: What makes a value proposition compelling?
Bbarbara (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I've added it as an external link. Jprw (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Edited because a value proposition is definately not an offer, it's a part of strategy, as shown in most of the references.
Also added back in the 6th stage of the Value Proposition Builder as someone had removed it.
Added back in one of the links to one of the models refered to. Added in 2 extra citations that were missing, Kaplan & Norton and Rackham.
Siztrust (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Could someone please add a simple definition of value proposition? The article appears to lack a definition. 72.19.163.158 (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
It is not explicit that the Value Cycle is linked to the Osterwalder and Pigneur citation. Where is the information sourced from if not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maniacfox123455 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Misattributed definition in lead
The lead attributed a "definition" of value proposition to Lanning & Michaels' 1988 McKinsey staff paper ("a clear, simple statement of the benefits...along with the approximate price"). I've read the paper (available on the DPV Group site) and that wording does not appear anywhere in it — the paper discusses the elements of a value proposition but offers no single formal definition. What it actually says is: "A business unit promises customers some value, a combination of benefit and price. It thus offers a value proposition." (p. 3). I've replaced the misattributed quote with the genuine one, cited. The invented wording is widely repeated online, but those sites appear to derive from this article rather than from the paper. The Gladdiator (talk) 11:58, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.