Talk:Uber

GreyballGreyball was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 19 March 2022 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uber article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Transport Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Apps High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Craig at Uber (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 29 March 2022 and 19 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarshWicker (article contribs).

Can someone help add the section on trademark disputes for Uber? I have a good article explaining it. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/uber-hit-with-trademark-lawsuit-over-new-travel-services-2022-05-12/ WikiGrower1 (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

As the article stands, we have flat history chronology with no subheadings, and it's an NPOV problem, not just a readability one.

A few examples:

• "In January 2022, Uber acquired Australian car-sharing company Car Next Door." The next paragraph is a leak of 124,000 internal documents.
• DOJ criminal charges against the former Chief Security Officer for obstruction of justice. Then immediately followed by the 2040 carbon-neutrality pledge. Consecutive paragraphs, comparable length.
• A gold membership in the Linux Foundation gets its own paragraph. So does an $271.8M class action settlement.

This isn't just difficult to navigate. It's scattering related material all over the place.

Significant regulatory, labour, and safety material is interleaved with routine acquisition announcements and minor corporate milestones, and so on. These are items of very different weight reading at the same level, a clear violation of WP:WEIGHT, and ultimately WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and WP:STRUCTURE:

Watch out for structural or stylistic aspects that make it difficult for a reader to fairly and equally assess the credibility of all relevant and related viewpoints.

Related material that recurs in multiple places like this makes it difficult to follow any one thread and actively works against NPOV.

When the record on these events is this extensive and significant, the undifferentiated dating is actively diluting it. We have driver classification issues sprinkled across five separate places, data breaches in four, regulatory evasion in three, all scattered across three thousand words of history, and the reader is structurally prevented from following any of this material end to end at all.

A very sophisticated POV push, and it's completely unreadable.

I propose that content should be grouped along these lines:

• History - founding and early growth (2009-2013). Expansion and regulatory conflict (2013–2017). Leadership change and restructuring (2017–2019). Public company (2019–present)
• Operations - Services. Business model. Autonomous vehicles.
• Legal and regulatory issues - Driver classification. Regulatory evasion. Data privacy and breaches. Consumer protection. Passenger safety litigation.
• Corporate culture
• Finances

To be clear on the structure point: these subsections are organized by subject, not by stance. Company responses would stay folded into the relevant narrative rather than being answered back at in a separate passage, as it should be. tofubird | ✉ 06:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply