Talk:Turing's proof
Problems with the first proof:
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Problems with the first proof:
Suppose I switch D with a simple machine that always outputs "s". In such a case, H would loop when reaching K anyway. Doesn't it kind of makes the H machine fail by itself, making the need of D for it to fail irrelevant? And wouldn't it invalidate the proof about the existence of D? I don't mean to say that the Halting Problem isn't undecidable, but just that Turing's original proof is flawed. Or am I missing an important point here?
I've got it! The point is that D cannot output correctly its analysis of H. If D decides that H is circle-free, H becomes circular. And if D decides that H is circular, H becomes circle-free, since it wouldn't have to enter that whole circular calculation of itself. Therefore, D cannot be always right!
Summary of the Third Proof
Was written "Here Turing proves "that the Hilbert Entscheidungsproblem can have no solution" (Undecidable, p. 145). Here"
The definition of the word "can" is useful. It means is able to or permitted to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.250.64.202 (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
At least change the title
I'm not sure this proof belongs on Wikipedia, or in a separate article; if it does, then that article must have a title and intro that make some sense to non-experts. Rp (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.