Or record — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.104.71 (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Or record — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.104.71 (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Anyone know the font of the logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.180.90 (talk) 14:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
On Roku or Firestick, we have a hard time with streaming properly, it will go and stop for a few seconds, won't happen on a tablet except during commercials. We don't like watching shows that interrupt even 2 seconds 😒 2600:1007:B0A9:59A8:1DCD:CAFA:DB07:9F6F (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Why do the "Original documentary specials" and "Original films" sections have a "No." column? It seems to be numbered by release date, which is already taken care of by the Release Date column, and this numbering system does not appear to come from Tubi. I propose deleting the "No." column as it seems to serve no purpose. Nisf (talk) 14:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Blockchain Creative Labs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Blockchain Creative Labs until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Tubi introduced a new logo today, [1]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/tubi-s-new-redesign-wants-to-push-you-down-the-rabbit-hole/ar-BB1j4eNg MightyArms (talk) 00:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
"Tubi became inaccessible throughout the European Union as a result of the GDPR entering into force" makes it sound like the GDPR prohibits services like Tubi, which it does not, as it concerns privacy, not intellectual property or copyright. A large number of foreign websites ceased servicing EU users due to their noncompliance with regards to cookies and data harvesting (in many cases simply adding a cookie consent banner would have sufficed). It is quite likely, although I am unable to confirm it, that it's not the GDPR itself, but rather Tubi's noncompliance with it (in whatever shape or form) that is at issue.
Should the relevant paragraph be reworded more neutrally to avoid unilaterally placing blame with the GDPR/the EU, since we don't (seem to) know the specific issues between Tubi and the GDPR? I.e. "after the GDPR entered into force", rather than "as a result of", perhaps with something along the lines of "although the company hasn't commented on any specific issues" or the likes (I'm sure a more experienced editor could word this better than me). ~2026-37759-18 (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.