Shouldn't this be its own article? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Shouldn't this be its own article? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I notice that the {{refimprove}} tag has been added to this stub article. Why? What are the limits for its inclusion on a three line stub article? Is the BBC an unreliable source? It seems perfectly reasonable to me that a short stub such as this (not on a BLP) should have only one source that is authoritative. The BBC article covers all the angles, what exactly needs improving about it specifically? Woody (talk) 01:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I suggest this article be merged or linked with the more extensive Well kill. - 174.51.44.36 (talk) 05:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Isn't this also used onshore? From what I remember hearing on AC360 and other news programs, they say that it is almost 100% successful on land...
76.66.193.224 (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.