Talk:Tipalti

I recommend editors to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects.

Talk:Tipalti

Reminder to Editors

I recommend editors to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects.

It's a good first step that previous editors have disclosed their conflicts of interest and connections to the company, but Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion nor a list or collection of milestones and company trivia.

I'm going to work on updating the page for Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I have no connection to the company and am not affiliated in any way to Tipalti.

Similarly, there seems to be a back-and-forth on whether Tipalti is an Israeli company in recent edits. According to recent Wikipedia:Reliable sources (i.e., trusted online news articles) Tipalti was founded by Israelis, but the company appears to be American, given its U.S. headquarters and incorporation status. -Quixotic Rick (talk) 03:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I removed the headers, as I rewrote the page, primarily to fix the Wikipedia:PL issues in the History section. I also added reliable, news articles as sources throughout. Some of the previous references were actually Tipalti press releases published on other websites through a newswire service.
I dropped some of the descriptions of the company's products into a new, dedicated Products and services category to make the page easier to read.
I'll keep an eye on the page, but I'd appreciate if others who are subject-matter experts in the company and industry could help contribute, keeping to avoid Wikipedia:COI and maintain Wikipedia:NPOV. Quixotic Rick (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

I am the director of marketing for [Tipalti] and am submitting what I hope is a non-promotional page to identify the company. Thanks!

Awards List for Tipalti Page

Currently, the Tipalti Wikipedia article page does not have an "Awards and Recognition" section. I would like to request it be added to the Article page below the "History" section and be populated with the following award wins:

TrustRadius’ Top Rated Accounts Payable Software 2022[1]

Rank 23 on Fortune’s 40 Best Small and Medium Workplaces in the Bay Area in 2021[2]

No. 1260 on Inc. 5000 in 2021[3]

TrustRadius’ Best of Finance Software 2021[4]

Leader in the IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SaaS and Cloud-Enabled Midmarket Accounts Payable Applications 2020-2021 Vendor Assessment[5]

Spend Matters’ 50 Providers to Know for 2020[6]

No. 1475 on Inc. 5000 in 2020[7]

No. 1196 on Inc. 5000 in 2019[8]

Tipalti Named to Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500™ in 2019[9]

Tipalti Named to Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500™ in 2018[10]

No. 1559 on Inc. 5000 in 2018[11]

Ranked 15th in San Francisco Business Times’ 2018 Bay Area Best Places To Work[12]

2017 Bay Area Best Places To Work from the San Francisco Business Times and the Silicon Valley Business Journal[13]


LisaAtTipalti (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi LisaAtTipalti, thanks for the edit request. I wanted to ask whether any of these Awards have articles on Wikipedia? (e.g. List of Fortune 500 computer software and information companies or 100 Best Companies to Work For) Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and an exhaustive list of awards would seem more promotional than adding to the article. Additionally, is there coverage for any of the above awards in independent news sources (i.e. not the body awarding them)? While the following is a draft Wikipedia guideline, I think it provides a useful rule of thumb for considering which awards to include: Wikipedia:Awards and accolades. I have marked your request declined for now, but after you reply with more information, please remove the "|D" in the {{request edit}} to re-open your request. Best, SpencerT•C 22:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also note why another editor removed the reference to the Inc. 5000 here: [1]. SpencerT•C 22:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Accounts Payable Software". TrustRadius. TrustRadius.
  2. ^ "40 Best Small and Medium Workplaces in the Bay Area". Fortune. Fortune.
  3. ^ "Company Profile". Inc. Inc.
  4. ^ "Tipalti Continues Revenue Growth by More Than 80%, Increases Annualized Transactions to More Than $23 Billion". Bloomberg. Bloomberg.
  5. ^ "IDC MarketScape Names Tipalti a Worldwide Leader in Midmarket Accounts Payable Applications". TMCnet. TMCnet.
  6. ^ "50 Providers to Know for 2020". Spend Matters. Spend Matters.
  7. ^ "Company Profile". Inc. Inc.
  8. ^ "Company Profile". Inc. Inc.
  9. ^ "2019 Technology Fast 500™ Ranking Recognizing growth" (PDF). Deloitte. Deloitte.
  10. ^ "Tipalti Ranked Among The Fastest Growing Companies in North America on Deloitte's 2018 Technology Fast 500™". BusinessWire. BusinessWire.
  11. ^ "Company Profile". Inc. Inc.
  12. ^ "Tipalti Ranked 15th in San Francisco Business Times' "2018 Bay Area Best Places To Work"". BusinessWire. BusinessWire.
  13. ^ "Tipalti Recognized as 2017 Bay Area Best Places To Work". PRNewswire. PRNewswire.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Tipalti/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Quixotic Rick (talk · contribs) 20:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sir MemeGod (talk · contribs) 16:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this shortly. :) SirMemeGod16:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    While it is well-written, it is very short for what we expect.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    There are citations in the lede, much of the information in the lede isn't mentioned anywhere else (e.g. that the company is headquartered in Foster City, California), seems somewhat promotional in nature, particularly regarding the "Notable Clients" part near the end of the article.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    No serious issues with the layout itself of the article, refs are in their appropriate section.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Crunchbase (ref 14) is considered unreliable. Others, including TechCrunch.com (ref 6) and Business Insider (ref 4) are marginally reliable.
    C. It contains no original research:
    Passes with no issue.
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    I found a 7.4% similarity with pymnts.com, which is too low to be plagarism. No other issues found here.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    Seems to address that the company is about and it's growth, which is what we look for. The issue is length, the article is neither long enough or has enough information.
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    No issue, doesn't go into unnecessary detail.
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    Seems slightly promotional in nature. As already stated, the "Notable Clients" section doesn't seem very useful other than for promotional reasons.
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    Edit War Checker found nothing, and a page history search also found no recent disputes.
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    One image, which is improperly sourced (called "Own Work" when it clearly isn't) and will most likely now be deleted.
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Only one image, not enough to accurately convey the topic. Logo also has no caption.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Unfortunately I am going to fail this nomination due to not meeting the following criteria: 1b, 6a & 6b. The article is short for what we expect out of a good article and the promotional tone does not represent Wikipedia's best work. No images (since the one is a copyright violation), among other things which I do not believe can be fixed in a timely manner. I suggest that you work to lengthen the article, find an image or two (the logo may fall under a fair use rationale) and then renominate. Thanks! :) SirMemeGod16:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed edit: Alphabetizing and updating the list of locations

Hello! I work for Tipalti, and I'd like to request a change to this article.

Thank you. Johnwikiwelton (talk) 18:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Dahawk04 (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I went ahead and made the edit! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed edit: additions to history and products

Hi again. I work for Tipalti, and I have a couple more changes to suggest for this article.

Second item:

Thanks! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Dahawk04 (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I went ahead and made the edit! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 17:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for History additions

Hello, Tipalti employee here again.

Thanks! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I left out the code to add the request to the centralized queue, adding now. (Johnwikiwelton (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC))Reply

I've made the requested edits with slight changes. Penny75 (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

Request for Products additions to page

Hello, I’m a Tipalti employee requesting some additions to the Products section.

Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 18:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for History additions

Hi, Tipalti employee here with a new request for the History section.

Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. IAmChaos 04:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 23:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for Product Addition

Hi, I'm a Tipalti employee with a new request:

Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 04:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not done for now: Hi, the short mention of them having AI in their products feels promotional, I'd recommend looking for more significant coverage that you could add, and only include any notable updates. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 23:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the feedback! ~2026-14326-47 (talk) 00:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request for History section

Hi, I'm a Tipalti employee. Sharing two new requests:

  • Text to be added (at the end of "Products and services"): As of 2025, Tipalti's accounts payable product has language support for German and English in Europe, and the company offers e-invoicing in eight countries. Tipalti also added integration with SAP Business One.
  • Reason for the change: Currently missing from article
  • Reference for the change: Brooks, Steve (November 6, 2025). "A Conversation with Tipalti". Enterprise Times. Retrieved March 23, 2026.

Thank you! ~2026-14326-47 (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

There are few paragraphs on the same section. Where would you like to include it? Excelse (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Excelse: Apologies I was not logged in when I sent that request. I think best place would be at the end Products and Services meaning just ahead of Reception section. Would that work? Johnwikiwelton (talk) 19:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Not done The requested additions are fairly promotional and do not add much depth regarding the company itself; while e-invoicing or German-language support would be useful to the consumer, it would be much less so for an encyclopedia reader. Additionally, it is unclear what you mean by "added integration with SAP Business One"; this sounds more like business jargon. SpencerT•C 14:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the feedback! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request for Infobox

Hi, I'm a Tipalti employee. Sharing another new request:

Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 19:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 19-JUN-2026

  Edit request declined  

  • The purpose of the infobox is to provide instant pathways to locations within and outside the project that can increase readers' understanding of the topic at hand. These pathways are accomplished through the use of H:WIKILINKs.
  • The substitute terms you have supplied here for inclusion in the infobox contain incomplete wikilinks or no wikilinks. These would not provide an increased understanding of the topic at hand.

Regards,  Spintendo  20:02, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Got it. I see what you mean. How about this?
Thanks for reviewing! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 04:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 22-JUL-2026

✅  Edit request implemented    Spintendo  06:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Johnwikiwelton (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Two requests for Products and services

Hi, Tipalti employee here with two new requests:

  • Text to be updated (third paragraph of Products and services section): Update "Tipalti's software uses AI and machine learning to automate data entry and other financial tasks;" to "Tipalti's finance automation software uses AI to manage payments, procurement, and other corporate financial tasks;"
  • Reason for the change: Incorporates newer source and more accurate current information on the product
  • References for the change:

One more edit:

  • Text to be added (to end of first paragraph of Products and services section): As of 2026, Tipalti processed $90 billion in total payments annually.
  • Reason for the change: Conveys the size of the business
  • Reference for the change: Bachman, Justin (June 24, 2026). "Tipalti counts on future IPO". Payments Dive. Retrieved July 23, 2026.

Thanks for your review. Johnwikiwelton (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 5-AUG-2026

🔼  Clarification requested  

  • There is already a sentence which addresses financial payouts: Tipalti brought in $182 million in revenue and processed $70 billion in payments in 2024 What is to become of this sentence? I don't believe you'll want to leave it in, as Wikipedia is not a stock ticker. Please advise.
  • When ready to proceed, kindly change the {{Edit COI}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=y to |ans=n.

Thank you! Regards,  Spintendo  21:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Spintendo: I agree, it makes sense to remove that sentence since the proposed addition covers similar but more recent information. Thanks for your reply. Johnwikiwelton (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.