Talk:Time preference/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be m

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Unsuccessful. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: SurfingPenguinPhd (talk · contribs) 23:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 02:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am quickfailing this nomination. First, the article does not comply with the Manual of Style layout guideline (GA criterion 1b). Second, there is an uncited section and several paragraphs lack citations (2b). Third, it appears to contain the article authors' original thoughts, and does not neutrally describe the subject in summary style (2c; 3b; 4). For example:

  • Work on time preference with John Rae’s “The Sociological Theory of Capital” in an attempt to answer why wealth differed across nations.
  • However, they failed to interpret the interest on a riskless loan and hence denounced the time preference discounter as sinful and usurious.
  • This may be due to the varying elicitation methods for the studies themselves. Put another way, how a study asks questions to uncover the discount rate can influence the result itself. (also lacks any citations)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.