Talk:The Wheel of Time

Talk:The Wheel of Time
Former good article nomineeThe Wheel of Time was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

TEotW now on bestseller lists.

Sorry, I’m not a practiced editor. Apparently TEotW is #1 on the NYT audio bestseller list, as well as placing on the the NYT mass market list and the USA Today list. 2600:1702:1D70:1EF0:E03D:6A41:6DDE:FCFF (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Old Tongue needs a mention

Just a passing visit; I notice that the Old Tongue is now not even mentioned here. At least one WP:RS exists, Barnes, Lawrie; Van Heerden, Chantelle (2006). "Virtual languages in science fiction and fantasy literature". Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Southern Africa. 37 (1): 102–107. doi:10.1080/10228190608566254. S2CID 144894796.. I note that fans have created whole dictionaries translating between Old Tongue and English (indeed, multiple real-world languages), so it seems the matter is significant. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

First mention of the one power in PLOT

The first mention of the one power under the plot heading says only women can handle the one power safely which is not true by the completion of the series. 76.115.45.5 (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.