Talk:The SWORD Project

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bible Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of Eloquent was merged into The SWORD Project on 12 January 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Absent distinct notability, Eloquent should be merged in with The SWORD Project. That front ends of The SWORD Project should be merged into the main article for the project was part of the consensus that arose from the AfD in 2006: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Sword_Project --Oskilla (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am in favour of the proposed merge. DFH (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 Done

Article history moved to Eloquent (The SWORD Project). – wbm1058 (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

This article has an extensive list of frontends that make use of the SWORD project, but are not themselves part of the SWORD project. Many of these are either unsourced, or there only sources are selfpublished (or press release type repostings, which is as good as selfpublished). Should we really be listing all of these here? If so, should we pare this down to only sourced the entries with independent sourcing? Should we use a more compact way to display these, such as a table?

My personal preference would be to remove all the stuff without independent sourcing and compress what is left (if that is anything) into a table or a bulleted list. - MrOllie (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Id prefer to leave it as it is, the STEPBible entry was merged here after an AFD discussion and that might be the case for some of the other entries. The participants in that AFD felt this was a suitable place for the applications. Also, your edit warring to remove the links instead of discussing it was not collegiate, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Even the completely unsourced ones?

As to the external links, your revert seemed to be based on a clear misunderstanding of the guideline about official sites. If you feel strongly that the links should be retained, I could go somewhere like WP:ELN for more opinions. - MrOllie (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply