Backreading through the talk page and revision history, it looks like there was more or less a pissing contest over what the band could or could not be consider
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Protomen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Backreading through the talk page and revision history, it looks like there was more or less a pissing contest over what the band could or could not be considered genre-wise, among other things, that lead to mass over-citing that made the article messy to read to your average Wikipedia user. To make life easier, I've moved the citations in their style and influences section to the end of sentences or logical end of thoughts, but now it's very clear this article is in the domain of WP:OVERCITE. Similar geek rock or nerd rock groups such as The Megas, Starbomb, and Ninja Sex Party usually have 1-2 sources per sentence (or logical thought conclusion point) and at most, in one occasion, 5 on the Ninja Sex Party page. The "critics describe..." section of The Protomen has 12. I think it'd be best for the health of the article to cull a good deal of redundant sources where possible, or (if ALL citations MUST be kept,) re-cite the page entirely with H:CITEBUNDLEs made where necessary. The coding of H:CITEBUNDLEs does require that all citations in a cite bundle be standalone citations, so they can't be referenced in other parts of the article, which is why the entire page would likely need to be re-cited. Sedonaramona (talk) 21:41, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The readability with the citations is a concern. I can look at bundling all of the genre and related citations in an EFN or similar, which should still work with the existing cross references without breaking anything. Thanks for the feedback! Pingnova (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
