Talk:The Chicago Defender

This article refers to 'Abbott' and his/her importance several times without ever giving a first name or title as though this text is a piece of a larger articl

Talk:The Chicago Defender

Untitled

This article refers to 'Abbott' and his/her importance several times without ever giving a first name or title as though this text is a piece of a larger article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.209.142 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article shares much with the PBS article at http://www.pbs.org/blackpress/news_bios/defender.html. --Bejnar (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • The PBS broadcast film The Black Press: Soldiers Without Swords (The Black Press: Soldiers Without Swords at IMDb) was released in 1999, and it is believed, based upon dates in the Internet Archive, that the PBS Black Press pages were created at that time. The first occurrence in the Internet Archive of "The Chicago Defender" page is the 12 July 2000 entry. That entry predates the creation of this page on 12 August 2002 by Shsilver. Although both the PBS article and this page may share a common non-copyrighted source, there is no evidence of this. As a result of this investigation I will delete the compromising text. --Bejnar (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have no problem with you deleting possible copyrighted text, although you might have wanted to do so in a manner which didn't compromise the integrity of the article itself. Perhaps actually replace the lede rather than simply delete it.Shsilver (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Huh?

"In just three years from 1919–1922[1] the Defender also attracted the writing talents of Langston Hughes and Gwendolyn Brooks."

The linked bio says Brooks was five at the end of 1922. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.18.224 (talk) 09:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Neglected source

The 2004 feature article "Black Is Back" in Editor & Publisher goes into some depth about the paper's reemergence in that era. Worth digging into it, for possible expansion of Wikipedia coverage.

[1]

-Pete Forsyth (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.