Talk:Tensor calculus

This page seems like it seems like a stub-class duplicate of the well-developed Ricci Calculus page. Is there any reason not to merge them? Krb19 (talk) 18:04,

Talk:Tensor calculus
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Tensor calculus into Ricci calculus on the grounds of overlap or duplication. Klbrain (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page seems like it seems like a stub-class duplicate of the well-developed Ricci Calculus page. Is there any reason not to merge them? Krb19 (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Different conventions for which is covariant and which is contravarient

The merged Tensor calculus and Ricci calculus article should inclued a § Nomenclature section explaining that there are two conventions as to whether tangent vectors are covariant and contravariant, and stipulating which convention is used in the article. The same applies to Covariance and contravariance of vectors and Exterior algebra. The convention chosen should be consistent across these articles.

Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Covariant versus contravariant -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Noting that this discussion has now been archived; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2024/Oct#Covariant versus contravariant. Note that this seems redundant given that the merge (see last section) was only from referenced material, of which there was very little. So, the merge created no nomenclature conflict. Klbrain (talk) 17:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.