I've tried to shape up this article a bit, but I do get the impression that there is very little of interest in this article. For a function that is symmetric i
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I've tried to shape up this article a bit, but I do get the impression that there is very little of interest in this article. For a function that is symmetric in its n arguments but has no other known properties, one can say that it, um..., is symmetric. For the rest it seems that all interesting stuff is in other articles, and this one neither provides an interesting (or even comprehensible) summary, common point of view, or anything new. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Im not sure what an argument is, and there is no hyperlink? Bg9989 (talk) 22:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.