Talk:Static web page
How does "Programming skills are required to create it." make any sense when being compared to a dynamic webpage that requires knowledge of a scripting language
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Unclear
How does "Programming skills are required to create it." make any sense when being compared to a dynamic webpage that requires knowledge of a scripting language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.217.225.12 (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Needs
- citations
- aprox. number of static pages at the Web, this days and in evolution (down) from the past.
- change "Benefits of dynamic publishing" to "Benefits of static publishing" (looks like a typo, as this discusses the benefits of a static page, not dynamic) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MEBPuckett (talk • contribs) 22:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Need links to internal page on Cloud CMS, which make static sites easy to update with high cadence without coding knowledge. Examples include CloudCannon and Siteleaf. Jhabdas (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Content either from or used by an external source directly
Sorry, not sure what the right term is. Anyway, http://www.edinteractive.co.uk/article/?id=4 This site has very very similar information, and at least some of it is directly copied. I don't know if this article is copying the page, or if the page is copying this article. 74.128.43.180 (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.