Talk:StarCraft

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look at it and noticed the following:

Talk:StarCraft
Former good articleStarCraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
December 15, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
February 23, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
July 5, 2013Good topic removal candidateDemoted
July 4, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Article review

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look at it and noticed the following:

  • There are some uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. While none of the paragraphs in "Story" need to be cited per WP:PLOTCITE, the "StarCraft II" paragraphs probably do need citations. There are also uncited statements at the end of some paragraphs (and I can add citation needed templates to those places if anyone is interested).
  • There are lots of one-sentence pargaraphs that should be merged with other content.
  • The plot summaries might be too long. Right now the plot section is over 1500 words, while WP:VG/CONTENT recommends a maximum of 700 words. I do not think every game and expansion needs as much information as present in the article about its plot.
  • The "Sales" section seems to be outdated and underdeveloped.
  • The "Starcraft" section in "Music" seems to be underdeveloped.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 04:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

There are some uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. While none of the paragraphs in "Story" need to be cited per WP:PLOTCITE, the "StarCraft II" paragraphs probably do need citations. There are also uncited statements at the end of some paragraphs (and I can add citation needed templates to those places if anyone is interested). There are lots of one-sentence pargaraphs that should be merged with other content. The plot summaries might be too long. Right now the plot section is over 1500 words, while WP:VG/CONTENT recommends a maximum of 700 words. I do not think every game and expansion needs as much information as present in the article about its plot. The "Sales" section seems to be outdated and underdeveloped. The "Starcraft" section in "Music" seems to be underdeveloped. Z1720 (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"StarCraft Shareware" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect StarCraft Shareware has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 10 § StarCraft Shareware until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 06:50, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

"T-280 Space Construction Vehicle" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect T-280 Space Construction Vehicle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 10 § Akilae Tribe until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 07:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.