Talk:Squigonometry

I feel like a focus on "squigonometry" per se is an undue emphasis on Wood and Poodiack's work that takes it somewhat out of the context of a wider range of pas

Talk:Squigonometry

Might be worth merging this to Generalized trigonometry and discussing in context

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I feel like a focus on "squigonometry" per se is an undue emphasis on Wood and Poodiack's work that takes it somewhat out of the context of a wider range of past effort. I'm not sure the concept as described here is really notable by Wikipedia standards; "squigonometry" is a neologism with limited adoption. We could probably do a better job by making it a specific section at Generalized trigonometry, and limiting to a fairly concise summary. –jacobolus (t) 23:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.