Talk:Speechify

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: I have a connection to Speechify (I work for the company). In line with WP:COI and WP:PSCOI, I am not editing the article direc

Talk:Speechify

COI edit request: voice AI platform and Simba models

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: I have a connection to Speechify (I work for the company). In line with WP:COI and WP:PSCOI, I am not editing the article directly and am instead requesting that uninvolved editors review and, if appropriate, incorporate the material below. I have kept the wording neutral and, wherever possible, cited independent reporting rather than the company's own press releases; please trim anything that still reads as promotional. (This request has been revised as I found stronger independent sources; an earlier outdated ranking figure was removed.)

Thanks for taking a look. ~2026-38595-10 (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: The {{request edit}} template is for requesting changes to semi-protected pages. For conflict of interest requests, please use {{Edit COI}} instead. I've updated the template for you. meamemg (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Meamemg, appreciated — and sorry for the wrong template. One update since I posted: the ranking in item 3 now also has a company press release (added as a clearly-labelled supplementary citation only; the independent OfficeChai write-up and the leaderboard itself remain the primary support). I'm mindful this is a live, volatile leaderboard and a promotional claim, so I'm entirely happy for that sentence to be trimmed or dropped if you feel it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. The recognition and product-history items (1 and 2) are the parts I'd most like considered, as they rest on independent reporting. ~2026-38595-10 (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Update: I re-checked the live Artificial Analysis leaderboard and both the default and "selected voice" views now agree — Simba 3.2 is first at Elo 1233, with Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS second (1214). I've added the Elo figure to item 3 accordingly. (An earlier momentary discrepancy I mentioned appears to have been a stale cache.) ~2026-38595-10 (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 19-JUL-2026

  Edit request declined  

  • The proposed text contains references from TechCrunch which act as press releases. (See WP:TECHCRUNCH.)

Regards,  Spintendo  23:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.