it would be nice to note if the bat feeds on it's own young, and if it follows the same pattern as other bats raising their young,and relationship wise.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
it would be nice to note if the bat feeds on it's own young, and if it follows the same pattern as other bats raising their young,and relationship wise.
someone else's comment
The animal in the photo is not a Vampyrum spectrum. It is a fruit bat of the leaf-nosed bat subfamily Stenodermatinae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.73.249.242 (talk • contribs)
Fair use rationale for Image:Vampyrum Spectrum.JPG
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image:Vampyrum Spectrum.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am told vampire bats only fly out of a cave in one direction. Is this true? If not can you please tell more about the flying pattern of the spectral bat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.192.13 (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
confidence in the missus
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm assuming you mean the single line breaks? I generally write articles like that better because I find it easier to organize and read. There isn't a policy about it, and it doesn't affect how the text is displayed to the reader.
George Gilbert Goodwin. Doesn't have an article. I could (1) remove his name entirely—"The genus and species names were not used in their current combination until 1942." or (2) add more information—"The genus and species names were not used in their current combination until Goodwin did so in his 1942 publication, "Mammals of Honduras."
Many mammals have tribosphenic molars, molars with three cusps. Basically, most of its molars are the "normal" tribosphenic design while the last upper molars are smaller with only two cusps. I hyperlinked to vestigiality|reduced, but let me know if I can make that clearer in-text.
I added leaf-nosed bat to the lede with a hyperlink. I also hyperlinked the firs occurrence in the article. Leaf-nosed bat is the common name for bats in the family Phyllostomidae.
You might wanna use common names instead of taxonomic names (and put the taxonomic name in parentheses on first mention). Also, the first time you mention a species, put its taxonomic name in parentheses next to it User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk22:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Which instances of taxonomic names do you think should be replaced?
They were a holdover from before I started editing. I have removed most of them (and am fine removing the rest), but can you find the policy that says ADW is a non-RS? I can't locate it (though I did notice that the taxonbar links to ADW).
I haven’t seen a policy, it’s just every time I have an article with ADW, the reviewer says it’s not reliable, which I’ve never really understood since it’s written by university students and reviewed by professors User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk15:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
It was once thought to supplement its diet with fruit, but a captive pair refused to eat any fruit over a 5-year period, this is true, but the spectral bat may still be an "opportunistic" carnivore. The species of bat has also been known to eat specific fruit that grows in its habitat, it says about the spectral bat here: http://bioweb.uwlax.edu/bio203/s2008/wheeler_adam/Nutrition.htm.
Hi 83.249.112.114 Wikipedia is based on what is published in reliable sources. The author of this website is an undergraduate college student and they do not list the sources that they're using to compile the information on this website. If I found a peer-reviewed scientific journal article that said they eat fruit sometimes, I would add that content to the article. Enwebb (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
It is mentioned in study given in the references, Journal of Mammalogy, Volume 85, Issue 4, 16 August 2004, Pages 708–713, https://doi.org/10.1644/BWG-121, which did not record fruit eating in their limited (n=8) sample, but cited Gardner A. L. 1977. Feeding habits. Pp. 293–350 in Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomatidae transcript So maybe? ~ cygnis insignis17:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, maybe. A so called "opportunistic carnivore" is not a true omnivore, so my point is that the spectral bat likely an opportunistic carnivore. But I agree with you on that description needing reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.112.114 (talk) 11:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.