Talk:Skill set
.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skill set redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2017. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Skill. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 16:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC). |
.
Quo vadis
Firstly thanks to the diligent editors who questioned this stub articles raison d'être- I have posted this list on the deletion discussion page. Here are a few positive suggestions of a future structure :
- Make a lead and make an article
- Look to a section
- Definition
- History
- Regional differencies
- Skill set within Wikipedia
- Skill set of a newbie
- Skill set of a established editor
- Skill set of wikipedia specialists
- Administrators
- Project coordinators
- Copy editors
- Paid wikimedia employees
- Arbcom
- Skill set within Wikipedia
- Skill sets within sectors
- Manual labourer
- Artisans
- Graduates
- Postgraduates
- Postdoctorals
- Diplomats
- Civil servants
- Politicians
- Conflicts arising from differing skill sets
- Economic and political implications
- Conflicts arising from differing skill sets
Now we need to categorise- Category:Human resource management seems a good place to start, and with in that there are three relevant subcategories. If I do get involved further these are directions I would intend to go.
I too share the concern that this article could become all-embracing and massive. So I advise that each section have a lead sentence, and a self-contained body so that will be easy to float off sub-articles in future. ClemRutter (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have posted comments on User talk:Kim Dent-Brown. I am a little confused at the redirection. ClemRutter (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- I plan to make a further expansion of the article now, as envisaged by the close. More anon. Andrew D. (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.