Talk:Sheffield

Talk:Sheffield
Former featured articleSheffield is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 20, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 31, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
October 8, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
July 14, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
July 29, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 14, 2026Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Former featured article

Images

I have refreshed the multiple images in the infobox added to this wiki page. I'm open to discussion of these images are not suitable. If the images are not suitable please change. Be Bold Thanks MatthewDavid41

Article review

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The article is also quite large and I think several sections can be summarised more effectively. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Z1720 sections like Education and Sport could be short and let the supporting articles expand on the detail Duncnbiscuit (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The article is also quite large and I think several sections can be summarised more effectively. Z1720 (talk) 01:11, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Z1720 I'll make a start on citing what i can, then summarising later. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Z1720 Yes! But finding the time and citations is proving difficult. I had forgotten all about it (real life getting in the way again!) Sorry. The joy of all things (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sheffield city center image

isnt even the city center ~2026-42782-31 (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Which one and what would you replace it with? 10mmsocket (talk) 07:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Use excerpt of lead from the Sport in Sheffield article eventually

The Sport in Sheffield article has multiple issues currently but if the standard of that article was improved, it's my view that using an excerpt of its lead might be a better approach than maintaining a summary of Sheffield Sport on this article as well as maintaining the main Sport in Sheffield article. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. Is there (sourced) content here that should into the Sport in Sheffield article to improve it? Otherwise, I'd just be bold and do it right now. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@10mmsocket I'm sure we could take good sources from this article and add them to the Sport in Sheffield article if they are missing. That article is lacking references so it wouldn't be surprising.
I think that Sport in Sheffields lead is quite good but the body of the article needs a fair amount of work. So I'd start there and see if the article's lead is still fit for purpose. At that point I would swap out the Sheffield article's Sport section for the excerpt. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Shout if you need help 10mmsocket (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@10mmsocket will do :-) Duncnbiscuit (talk) 08:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.