Talk:Shari Lewis

Shari Lewis was a true benevolent and will always be missed by those who hold her most dear. Rest in peace. --68.99.18.130 00:28, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Shari Lewis

Praise

Shari Lewis was a true benevolent and will always be missed by those who hold her most dear. Rest in peace. --68.99.18.130 00:28, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ironic?

I wanted to put in a link to the MemoryAlpha database and the only reference I can find to Shari Lewis is:

Cause of death

The cause of death of Shari Lewis is slightly different than the one listed on the Lamb Chop page. Here it is ovarian cancer and on the Lamb Chop page it is uterine cancer. User Bill Seeger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.21.158 (talkcontribs) 22:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Currently, this page gives uterine cancer as the cause; Lamb Chop (puppet) states that Lewis had ovarian cancer. Also, this page states that she had pneumonia, but does not state that the pneumonia was fatal. Lamb Chop states that it was the pneumonia that caused Lewis' death. I believe that she died of uterine cancer and pneumonia. Can anyone confirm that? If so, both this article and Lamb Chop (puppet) should be corrected to that effect. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sharilewis&lambchop.jpg

Image:Sharilewis&lambchop.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why were crows controversial in the sixties?

I may be dumb, but my understanding of the cultural backround of the sixties doesn't hold anything that would make crows controversial. I think it should be clarified in the article what the controversy there was, perhaps with a citation, even. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 15:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Guessing they were black, and as such seen as racist by those types who wish to see such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.107.88 (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh please!

"She was cremated. Her ashes were either given to a friend or family." Banal, equivocal and vulgar. --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 20:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC) What does she was survived by her husband etc mean? Sounds like they had to put up with her bad jokes or something Bouncingmolar (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Traditionally, it means she died and that her husband was the surviving or living spouse. ----moreno oso (talk) 12:44, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Abraham Hurwitz

The Wikipedia article on Shari Lewis, Early Life, states: "... Abraham Hurwitz, a founding member of Yeshiva University ,...". The Wikipedia article on Yeshiva University states that it was founded in 1886. The Wikipedia article on Future American Magical Entertainers states that Abraham Hurwitz was born in 1906. Can anyone explain this apparent discrepancy? Should the Wikipedia article on Shari Lewis be revised to: "... Abraham Hurwitz, an education professor at Yeshiva University, ..."? Tbeut (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Off-topic chat

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shari Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Needs Bibliography

The article mentions that Lewis wrote more than sixty books, but there is not even a partial list of them. That information should be added. OllyV (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.