Talk:Sensor fusion

Sensor fusion is completely different to multimodal integration, though to a casual observer they may seem similar. One is human perception, the other primarily

Talk:Sensor fusion

Merge?

Sensor fusion is completely different to multimodal integration, though to a casual observer they may seem similar. One is human perception, the other primarily robotic perception from what I can gather (not my field I'm afraid!). Sparkleyone 07:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

agreed

keep 'em separate


agreed

Sensor fusion / Sensor Data fusion - is the computer driven fusion of disparate data into knowledge. This includes: Simple fusion of data from multiple sensors over an area to generate a common set of readings for an area. complex fusion of multiple sensor to generate and identify "items" in the sensed area as being something.

--YaZug 13:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

What is this link : http://www.rl.af.mil/tech/programs/asf? Majorkell 18:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Citations?

A few paper citations have been missed here. For example, the intro paragraph is *very* familiar to (B.V. Dasarathy, Dynetics, Inc)

Also, the JDL Model of data fusion paper should be cited in the levels section - F.E. White, Managing data fusion system in joint and coalition warfare, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Data Fusion, Malvern, UK, 1998, pp. 49–52.

I don't know enough about the topic to know if these proposed citations are the 'original' papers that the respective ideas come from, so I am hesitant to put these in the article w/o verifying that first. 24.127.43.175 (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Content Ideas

In the section on Applications, source twelve is titled "Flight-Test Evaluation of Sensor Fusion Algorithms for Attitude Estimation" from an IEEE journal. The text that cites this source talks about figuring out "altitude." While altitude can most likely be determined using sensor fusion of GPS and an INS, the attitude (Roll/Pitch/Yaw) is much easier and is what the cited source is discussing.

The section on Centralized versus decentralized claims that "multiple combinations of centralized and decentralized systems exist." Are there examples of varying levels of centralization in the sources listed for this article? This statement is ambiguous.

What are the "Levels" used for? Who uses them? The US military? Research groups? It's not clear from the article text what the context for levels 0-5 are. Andrewkaster (talk) 04:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vision

I'm not sure what this has to do with the article, so moved it to talk page:

Sensory fusion is simply defined as the unification of visual excitations from corresponding retinal images into a single visual perception a single visual image. Single vision is the hallmark of retinal correspondence. Double vision is the hallmark of retinal disparity.

Gait analysis.

The citations in this article seem to be disproportionately oriented toward gait analysis. It'd probably improve if some more diverse applications were to be covered. (Nothing's wrong with this, per se, just making a note here in case I decide to do a run of expansions later on). jp×g

This URL for example https://web.archive.org/web/20120323133400/http://ricquebourg.iut-amiens.fr/these/fusion_2006/Papers/394.pdf 92.24.188.96 (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.