Is this a typo, or was there really a librettist named Rossi?
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this a typo, or was there really a librettist named Rossi?
-- Ventura 18:39, 2004 Oct 25 (UTC)
DG has a recording with la Studer and Larmore (I think?), and there is a new Nightingale recording with Gruberova.
Davetomala 16:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)davetomala 30-SEP-2007
I saw this list after adding the Nightingale recording on the main page. I don't know about the DG recording.Janie1232 23:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
There were other operas titled Semiramide written throughout history, including before Rossini. Shouldn't the earliest-known one be the default? I find not a mention of Salieri's here, which I find odd at least. Smyslov (talk) 14:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The lead says: "The extremely florid vocal style is often a vehicle for spectacular vocal display rather than an intrinsic part of the score". Is this one of the most important things so say about this opera? Is it just an insult? Who knows? Can we either get properly cited or get something a bit less hoity-toity? Even the booklet of the ArtHaus/Met Opera DVD can do rather better: "Semiramide was to be Rossini's last Italian opera ... [His] farewell gesture to the genre takes the form of a return to the great singing traditions of his youth. In a melodrama in the style so popular in Venice since the 17th century ... and with the kind of highly plastic tableaux typical of classical opera, Rossini has recreated the baroque tradition of decorative singing with unparalleled skill". [Guido Johannes Joerg, p.27; booklet to DVD cat. 100 222, ArtHaus Musik, 1991] If no one can top this I suggest we put it in. almost-instinct 14:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Semiramide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
From the introduction section of this article:
Seems like this wording is very biased and doesn't fit under Wikipedia's Manuel of Style editing. Also seems like a claim like this would need a source as well, but I wanted to confirm with another potential editor before I try to fix this eventually.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.