This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The page has been erroneously tagged with the Advert maintenance template. The tagger did not include the {Advert} tag in the article. They did not otherwise indicate the reason for the flag.
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I've added an UPE tag to this - history of IP editors making highly promotional edits suggests undisclosed paid editing at work. Needs 'significant' cleanup: gutting of infobox, remove promotional language, excessive company structure/acquisitions removed. Darren-Mtalk18:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Question: I am probably not as experienced or knowledgeable about this stuff as you guys are, but wouldn't a COI tag be more proper here? How can you assume it's paid editing vs. company employees or in-house staff? They have 500 employees according to the article. Anyone of them could have been making edits without knowing the Wikipedia rules and that COI needs to be disclosed. I checked several of these editors, several are IP edits and have very little edits and some of the user ID ones also have little edits, but again, how can you tell these are paid editors vs. Company staff or people having COI. If you have some special way to tell please enlighten me. Boredathome101 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Wiki Education assignment: National and International Cybersecurity Policy
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rhone2207 (article contribs).
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a section of this article that states Dell Inc. is a majority shareholder in this company. The problem is that it is
There is a section of this article that states Dell Inc. is a majority shareholder in this company. The problem is that it is not cited and that every shareholder list I could find doesn't list Dell Inc. or any majority shareholders. MarketScreener, however, does list Michael Dell as holding 100% of the company in one type. I will be adding a "citation needed" area next to there just to be safe. WiinterU (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Request to remove Michael Dell’s name from infobox
Latest comment: 1 year ago9 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hey there! I'm a Dell Technologies employee. I'd like to kindly request a change to the Secureworks infobox. Currently, the infobox lists Michael Dell as the chairman under “Key people”. However, following the acquisition of Secureworks by Sophos, Michael Dell no longer holds this position. I request for his information to be removed from the infobox.
This CRN article confirms that
Secureworks is no longer a Dell Technologies subsidiary. This change makes the current listing inaccurate.
User:PK650: Thank you for your quick reply and for raising this important question. At this time, there does not appear to be a reliable source that clearly identifies the new chairman for Secureworks. I'll continue to monitor for any updates from reputable publications that address this information and will follow up with you when new information becomes available. Thanks again! JM with Dell Technologies (talk) 16:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the follow-up, Sammi Brie! There are no recent media or news articles confirming that Michael Dell has stepped down as Chairman of Secureworks. Based on his LinkedIn profile, he held the role from April 2011 to February 2025, indicating his tenure ended at that time. While LinkedIn provides useful insights, it may not satisfy Wikipedia's sourcing criteria. I defer to you and the community to assess its sufficiency in this context. Thank you for your efforts to maintain the article’s accuracy! JM with Dell Technologies (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for confirming, Sammi Brie! I appreciate your guidance. Based on this, would you be open to removing Michael Dell's information from the infobox to ensure the article reflects the most accurate information? Thank you for your time and support! JM with Dell Technologies (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.