Why is the linked page propoganda? 70.112.34.179 (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2004
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why is the linked page propoganda? 70.112.34.179 (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2004
Is "high quality" appropriate in a dictionary article? 195.249.187.182 (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2007
On NumPy page it's written that NumPy 1.3.0, released 5 April 2009, supports Python 2.6. As SciPy depends on NumPy, maybe SciPy also supports Python 2.6? Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I would like to propose we extract the history portions of the first paragraph and create a slightly more extensive "History of SciPy" section within the article. And to then flesh out the first paragraph I would propose we speak to the two uses of the term SciPy, as the name for the entire scientific compute stack or set of packages for doing scientific computing with Python, as well as its meaning as the specific Python package of the same name. This would support the conclusion of the community discussion about the meaning of SciPy in a NUMFocus thread. http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/2012-October/033374.html
Any thoughts?
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.