Talk:Rp-process
Much of the material covered in this article is also relevant to the wiki on X-ray bursts. I would like us to consider how we can best integrate this material.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Rp-process vesus X-ray bursts
Much of the material covered in this article is also relevant to the wiki on X-ray bursts. I would like us to consider how we can best integrate this material. DAID 10:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Tellurium
I revised the sentence which claimed that lighter isotopes of Tellurium are thought to be stable and added the comment that they could potentially be proton-bound. A quick visit to the National Nuclear Data Center's chart of nuclei [1] makes it apparent that 105Te is already quite far from stability itself. I have little justification for including the possibility of lighter Te isotopes being proton bound, however I believe it is justifiable seeing as the proton drip line is territory on the frontier of nuclear physics. While the presence of theoretical thermonuclear reaction rate data [2] (for example: [3]) does not necessarily indicate a nucleus is bound, it does indicate that physicists believe an isotope might have some finite lifetime.--Potentialwell (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
This is a reasonable edit. Probably I authored "stable" for these proton-rich Te isotopes meaning proton-bound, which was not as clear as it could be, since I had assumed that these are all known to be beta-decayers (and that the rp-process is running entirely in the beta-plus-unstable zone). DAID (talk) 01:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rp-process/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This article was a stub in late 2006, and I marked it at that time for an article I would like to improve upon. Since then, it has had some moderate additions, but I recently went through each section and typed up a technically accurate, yet reader friendly and well-linked revision. I would like to see more citations on this article in the future. I apologize for not citing my sources for this information, as it is the subject of my current research, and all this information floats around in my head without citations, so I will make an effort to fix this in the future. DAID 11:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 11:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.