Talk:Rose Cross

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

Talk:Rose Cross

Rosy Cross Origins

Why no inclusion of the origins of the Rosy Cross? The Rosy Cross degree was established by Robert the Bruce in 1314 following the Battle of Bannockburn.

Merger

This page is almost exactly the same as Rose-Cross, although that page has a slightly better perspective on the origins from the Rosicrucians, which this page seriously lacks. However, since the subject of these two articles is essentially the same, these pages should be merged. --Jackhorkheimer 05:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

no i disagree - the rose cross and the rosey cross lamen as shown are two totally different items.

The rose cross is a christian symbol created to represent the rosicrucians as previously mentioned.

The rosey cross is a a lamen used my several magical traditions including the \Golden Dawn and even Wicca, but which actually predates christianity.

http://altreligion.about.com/library/glossary/symbols/bldefsrosecross.htm

but which actually predates christianity
I'd seriously dispute the veracity of that claim. What prooof is there?
Nuttyskin (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge

I say do the merge. The Rose-Cross and the Rosy-Cross are pretty much the same. One may make a distinction saying one is a drawing while one is a lamen (or pendant) but both are emblems of those persons who call themselves Rosicrucians. Eyes down, human. 03:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do not merge. As already stated above by 82.21.109.76, this Rosy Cross article here, although about organizations linking themselves to the Rosicrucian tradition, is not describing the same symbol of the hermetic-Christian tradition that the Rose Cross article refers to. --Lusitanian 00:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I vote for of the merge. Even the above link seems to confirm that the rosy cross used by the Golden Dawn is closely related enough to the Rosicrucian symbol to be covered in the same article. Frankly, the assertion that one predates Christianity strikes me as POV. Of course, I'd be willing to reconsider if someone more knowledgeable presents better evidence. Lusanaherandraton (talk) 00:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

While the article Rosicrucianism presents an historical, legendary and philosophical view of the Rosicrucian Tradition as a whole; this article Rosy Cross is presenting specific details about a few modern groups, already identified in the article-section Rosicrucianism#Para-Masonic groups, akin to the red cross "stream". From my point of view, these specific views should be inserted in the existing articles related to each modern group; since the article Rose Cross already mentions the distinction of the white and red cross within the Rosicrucian tradition.--195.23.163.8 (talk) 02:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sex

Perhaps someone might mention that one interpretation of the rosy cross is simply that it (like the hexagram) is yet another mystic sex symbol: the rose and cross standing in for yoni and ligham. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.225.104 (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image conversion

Is there anyway to convert this image to a clearer picture like one with no background with a more prominent rose? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:8200:8F20:6233:4BFF:FE1A:23BD (talk) 01:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

French

Why is it also called "Rose Croix" (meaning pink cross or cross (of) the rose in French)? It would be interesting to know why French is used when nothing in this article talks about this country in its history.

Symbol

The legend of the image is too short. Why this image and not another one, where did you take it? Please tell us. The Rose is an interesting hermetic symbol, but it's not mentioned in the article, or linked to another page or site.

Masonry

On Wikipedia, Free masons users have this symbol in their infobox, but nothing in the article talks about masonry, or any other brotherhood. Why?

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.