Talk:Regular sequence
I think it's probably better to move this to regular sequence (algebra), now; and then redirect regular sequence to that.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Moving (2004)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
I think it's probably better to move this to regular sequence (algebra), now; and then redirect regular sequence to that.
Charles Matthews 08:17, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
That seems fine to me. I noticed yesterday that I wanted to put in some redirections as I've seen you do, but I don't know how to do it yet. Another related page is Koszul complex, which I'll put in part of today.
So that's done now. Redirect syntax is like
- REDIRECT Whatever.
Charles Matthews 16:35, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
possible typo in the text
Hmm, the text says that the depth of R is the depth of the R-module R itself. A bit later it states that the dept of an R-module is at most the dimension of this R-module. This sentence seems to imply that the depth of R itself is at most 1? Or should one add the comment that the restriction to the depth only applies for free R-modules?
Melchior 146.186.134.176 (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Move? (2011)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Regular sequence (algebra) → Regular sequence –
- "Regular sequence" is a dab page which is no more needed because one of the two uses is rare and the disambiguation is resolved by a hatnote in "regular sequence (algebra)". Thus the precision "(algebra)" is also not needed D.Lazard (talk) 11:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- This is a good solution. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Since there are only 2 items, and this seems to be the primary topic. --Enric Naval (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Some authors also require ..."?
I don't think it is correct to say that only some authors require that . This requirement is critical to a correct definition. We can always add (or a unit) to the sequence otherwise. Perhaps this can be clarified. If we do not have the requirement , then we can also drop the requirement that this quotient is non-zero. kapil (talk) 05:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.