Talk:Reference implementation
Merge done. The Hokkaido Crow 21:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of reference implementation was merged into Reference implementation. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposal to merge with reference implementation
MergeDelete. Go ahead, obviously I did not check closely enough before creating this article. However I do think the title should disambiguate computing, because it is possible to have reference implementations in non-computing contexts. The Hokkaido Crow 20:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Merge done. The Hokkaido Crow 21:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
This article is basically unreadable. Simpler English needs to be used.
What
WTF? I'm a third year CS student and I can't make sense of this dense jibberish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.75.0.203 (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- I attempted to clarify the text - anyone want to check if it makes sense? Lekro (discuss) 23:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- I reviewed your changes. I wouldn't say it went from terrible to great. But was an improvement. I think it could be much better ... even today. Stevebroshar (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved with history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Reference implementation (computing) → Reference implementation — The article doesn't have to reside under a bracket title, when the non-bracket version just redirects here. (While there is the point that there is more types of reference implementations than the software ones: As long as we don't have any content on that...) Dvaer (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment there's a problem with edit histories, with this move, since the target location was merged here in 2005. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 04:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Current GeoServer website suggests otherwise
This page: GeoServer functions as the reference implementation of the Open Geospatial Consortium Web Feature Service standard, and also implements the Web Map Service, Web Coverage Service and Web Processing Service specifications.
Geoserver page: GeoServer is working with the OSGeo Foundation to be certified as compliant and we need your help. Thanks for your sponsorship and donations we are working towards restoring OGC testing into our nightly builds.
Im not that knowledgable about the standards but it seems as though their testing has been taken out and they are currently not OSGeo certified? And so they cant be a reference implementation?
- You probably should discuss this on Talk:GeoServer rather than here. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 12:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Of course, I made a mistake adding it here... my apologies
Intro disambiguation
WRT "In the software development process..."
Is 'software development process' needed? What other contexts is reference implementation applicable? If there are others, then is sw dev process an accurate disambiguation? Seems rather unrelated to the dev process. Maybe a more general 'software' or 'computing'. Stevebroshar (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Dubious intro IMO
WRT "a reference implementation is a program that implements all requirements from a corresponding specification"
Is it (always) a program? Does it have to implement all requirements? Does there have to be a specification? Stevebroshar (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.