Talk:RedEye

Image:EN-Chicago-Logo-Newspaper-R.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is

Talk:RedEye

Fair use rationale for Image:EN-Chicago-Logo-Newspaper-R.jpg

Image:EN-Chicago-Logo-Newspaper-R.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Renaming

This article could be renamed The (Chicago, Ill.) RedEye to match how the newspaper is cited.Bigturtle 15:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article is woefully out of date

Since I have a conflict of interest with the RedEye, I'll refrain from editing directly, but I will point out a few things here so someone else can come along and edit it:

  • The circulation is now 250,000. This increased last December. (sources: [1], [2])
  • It would be nice as well if someone mentioned RedEye's Internet strides such as their Google Wave experiment (source from Mashable [3] and it ended in April [4]), or the RedEye Royalty (a reader loyalty program of sorts [5]). This would need a bit more work, of course.

Thanks to whoever comes along. elektrikSHOOS 17:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've gone ahead and updated the number myself. If I have sources and I'm only updating a number, there shouldn't be an issue, but if anyone doesn't like it feel free to undo the edit. elektrikSHOOS 17:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.