Talk:Recursive grammar
Another more obvious meaning would be for recursive instead of recursively enumerable languages. The current def is not actually cited. JMP EAX (talk) 09:23, 17
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
erhm
Another more obvious meaning would be for recursive instead of recursively enumerable languages. The current def is not actually cited. JMP EAX (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
What does it mean "if it contains production rules that are recursive"? Is S -> aSa recursive? Perhaps so. What about the grammar with two rules A -> aB and B -> Aa? JMP EAX (talk) 09:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Also, the concept of leftmost derivation is not well defined above CFGs. JMP EAX (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
I see the this is another article "saved" at AfD by doing partial string matches versus random sources. JMP EAX (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- I first found the article when a wrong link in the Template:Formal languages and grammars had to be fixed: in line "Type-0, col. "Grammars", recursive grammar had to be corrected to unrestricted grammar; cf. Template_talk:Formal_languages_and_grammars#Removing "recursive grammar".
- I considered to suggest the article recursive grammar for deletion, but changed my mind as it is of somewhat use at the lower end of the language hierarchy (cf. bottom line of the template, non-recursive grammar redirects to recursive grammar).
- To define non-recursion formally, a strict partial order on the set of non-terminals would be required such that in each rule, each non-terminal on the lhs is strictly larger than each one on its rhs. Maybe, however, that notion doesn't make sense for grammars beyond context-free ones. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Except we want a reliable source to actually give this def and call it this, otherwise it's WP:OR. JMP EAX (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.