For MyAnimeList the producer company of the series is Studio Puyukai, but for Anime News Network it isn't that. Which company is the producer of series?--White
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Neither MAL or ANN's encyclopedia are very reliable sources (both being user generated), but looking at the credits on one of the episodes (at around the the 2:25 point) you can see that Puyukai is listed under animation production (アニメーション制作). So yes, it appears they are the producer. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
@G S Palmer: Nice work on that Production section, though I was wondering if it was the case to split it into a light novels "Publishing history", an anime "Production" and a "Soundtrack" sections. Anyway, are you sure about that which shows how their designs later evolved sentence? I think the main characters' representation below still shows how they were earlier (when Emilia's uniform was resembling that one from The Irregular at Magic High School).--Sakretsu (talk) 11:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sakretsu: Thanks. I had the same thought about splitting it up, though I hadn't considered splitting it beyond the light novels and the anime. As for the caption, I'm not sure if I see what you're saying. The image shows an earlier design for them, (the "Mahouka" design), and the caption is essentially trying to say "this is what they used to look like. Can you see the difference between it and how they look now?". Maybe instead of "how their designs later evolved", I should make it "how their designs would later evolve"? Or is that missing the point of your question? G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sure, they do work, but you can consider reorganizing them like this as well. I think both ways are acceptable. Regarding the caption, what I'm trying to say is that it might be kinda misleading, since one might guess the image is showing both the way the characters looked in the first place (back row) and how they later evolved (first row). Maybe something like Early concept art for the characters Subaru and Emilia, which points out why their designs later evolved. would be better, but if you feel like it shouldn't be changed, then leave it be.--Sakretsu (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ohhh, now I see what you're saying about the images; I'm just so used to seeing character designs organized this way that it didn't register. Yes, that could be a problem. As far as dividing up the production section between the various media sections... I would fight you tooth and claw on that. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
「Re:ZERO -Starting Life in Another World-」is wrong,it should be「Re: Life in a different world from zero」(Writing on japanese novel cover)-- Samishikute (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@White Demon:yes, but the anime originated from novels!So the name「Re:ZERO -Starting Life in Another World-」should only be written under anime but not the main name of full page. -- Samishikute (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The article lists Crusch's retainer's name as "Ferris", which he is indeed credited as in the source (and in the character design image there). However, in Crunchyroll's subtitles, he is called "Felix" (as well as "Felis" one time, presumably by mistake?). His character profile on the anime's website also uses this spelling, so barring any objections, I'm going to change it to Felix in the entire article. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just created a list of shorts for the series' episode list. I'm pretty sure that I got the airdates correct, but would appreciate if someone were to check me on it. The original source for the shorts lists the first one for a Friday, April 8 airdate, which was the day the first episode of the series regular aired on AT-X. Looking at the anime's website and at AT-X's website, it seems that Friday is the day that new episodes air on their channel, thus presumably it is also the day that the shorts are released. However, if you look at this source, it says that the short was broadcast on the 19th (which, by the way, doesn't line up with any AT-X broadcast). Plus, if you go back through the archives of the series' news page, it will show that the episodes weren't posted online until 4 days after the initial broadcast seemingly took place (i.e., episode 1 wasn't posted until the 12th). Given the above evidence, plus the fact that Crunchyroll is simulcasting the series on Fridays, I'm going to list that as the airdate for the series. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Image?
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just split the character list from this article into a separate page (List of Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World- characters). It would be nice to have a picture of the main cast that we could put at the top of the article, but I can't find one that really seems like it would fit. Here are a few possibilities: this shows about all of the major characters, but it's a bit crowded. Plus Subaru isn't very prominent. This is okay - if we could find a better resolution version. It would also be nice if the characters weren't divided up like that. This one, from a full page spread in vol. 3 of the 2nd manga series, shows the most prominent characters pretty well - except Subaru's face isn't visible. A full page spread from vol. 1 of the first manga could also be usable - except it only has the characters from the first arc, and frankly, the art isn't great. And then there's this, which focuses on the characters from the 3rd arc. And of course there's the promotional image for the anime, but everyone is positioned oddly in that. Any thoughts on which one might be best? Any suggestions for better ones? (Of course, we could also use the promo art for the SD shorts...). G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 00:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Review
Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments1 person in discussion
G S Palmer, according to my knowledge this is a radio show, named Re: Radio life in a different world from zero (Re:ゼロから始める異世界ラジオ生活). The show began broadcasting on March 28, 2016 and is broadcast on every Monday (21:30). Rie Takahashi (Emilia) hosts the show. Guests that appeared on the show included Yuusuke Kobayashi (Subaru), Inori Minase (Rem), Yumi Uchiyama (Puck), Rie Murakawa (Ram), Satomi Arai (Beatrice), Chinatsu Akasaki (Felt), Kana Ueda (Anastasia Hoshin) and Yui Horie (Felix). But I don't know that this facts are mentioned here.--White DemΩn(talk)17:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I'm thinking of nominating this for GA status in the near future. But before that happens, could someone write a proper plot summary for the series? Right now it's far too short. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew12:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but my summaries tend to be full of typos. Also the plot summary should follow the novel, not the premise. Additionally, there is so much information about the anime that it could be given its own article. Maybe we should consider asking more members from the Wikipedia project. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Rem/Ram's Birthday & See Also Section
Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Sure, if you can find a good way to work it in, go for it. Another alternative would be to add it to their entries on the character list, which already has some rudimentary reception material. As for the See also section, I disagree: according to WP:SEEALSO, "links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics." All You Need is Kill is definitely related to the series, since, as a light novel, it falls under the same category of entertainment (that covered by WP:ANIME), and it also uses the same time-travel mechanism. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 09:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. also looking at the characters section, is this based off of the anime or the entire series including the LN? Because looking at the character's page Rem is listed as a main character. She's not a main character in the entire series (there's arcs she's 100% absent from) but was a main character in the anime. Rem and Ram in the overall series are roughly equal in terms of importance including the LN (the main source material), which I am up to date on. So if Rem's a main, Ram's a main, or they both should be supporting characters. Personally I feel the altter, they are prominent supporting characters.Nyantatata (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
It should be based on the entire series. I'm not up to date on the light novels, so I would defer to your judgement on the matter. However, since she's definitely a main character in the anime, I personally would hesitate to remove her from the main character section. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 22:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@SimonLagann: isn't Crunchyroll the licensee for this series, and Funimation is just dubbing and distributing it? I'm quite certain I've seen a source to that effect, but can't seem to find it at the moment. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've added OVA sound track with sources. But I am lack of confidence with my Japanese, so I did not translate. If anyone knows how to translate them properly, feel free to update. -- Unnamelessness11:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge There is very little real world information about the game. Most of the content seems like a copy paste from a premise article you get to read in a preview article.Tintor2 (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
No merge This article should be marked as a stub and expanded upon. In addition, the page for Re:Zero is about the anime, whereas the article for the game is specifically about the game which is a completely separate entity. Ventrixs (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
No merge The game and LN aren't similar considering the fact that its plot, while similar also has alternate scenarios and has actual game play, even then other anime video games have their own articles so why should this one be an expection? ~ SuperSkaterdude45 (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"split-cour format"
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not sure what the best way to do it would be, but I think in the second paragraph it would be useful to describe to the reader what it's release schedule was instead of using colloquialisms.
--198.101.118.150 (talk) 11:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Requested move 28 June 2023
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Split proposal: Main article and TV series
Latest comment: 8 months ago6 comments6 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support Agreed a show based on a novel/manga with almost twice as many episodes as another show alos based on a novel/manga should get split 65 episodes should be enough for a article Isla🏳️⚧ 21:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support I agree, based on reasoning already existing and similar to how DBZ, Dragon Ball and Steins;Gate (Another White Fox anime) have their own TV Series pages. Miketheboomer (talk) 03:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.